Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Reminder: Quo Vadis Preferential Law Approach? A Survey on the Interpretation of Article 6(2) Rome I Regulation Across EU Member States

March 17, 2025/in News/by Tobias Lutzi
image_pdfimage_print

Benedikt Schmitz (University of Groningen) has kindly shared the following reminder of his Call for Participants with us.

The project concerns the interpretation of Article 6 (2) Rome I Regulation in the EU Member States and is very limited in nature. Time commitments are therefore very limited. Click here for more information.

We are still looking for scholars from Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxemburg, Malta, Romania, and Slovenia. Danish scholars may also participate on the basis of Article 5(2) Rome Convention.

The team currently consists of established scholars from 15 (former) EU Member States:

  • Austria: Andreas Schwartze (Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck)
  • Belgium: Cedric Vanleenhove (Universiteit Gent)
  • Bulgaria: Ilia Lassin (Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski)
  • Cyprus: Nicholas Mouttotos (Universität Bremen)
  • Germany: Benedikt Schmitz (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)
  • Greece: Kostas A. Rokas (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
  • Hungary: Ferenc Szilágyi (Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem Budapest)
  • Lithuania: Katarzyna Bogdziewicz (Mykolo Romerio universitetas Vilnius)
  • Netherlands: Benedikt Schmitz (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)
  • Poland: Anna Wysocka-Bar (Uniwersytet Jagiello?ski Kraków)
  • Portugal: Anabela Gonçalves (Universidade do Minho)
  • Slovakia: Dominika Moravcová (Trnavská univerzita v Trnave)
  • Spain: Anna María Ruiz Martín (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya) & Beatriz Añoveros Terradas (Universitat de Barcelona)
  • Sweden: Gunnar Bramstång (Lunds Universitet)
  • UK: Ross Pey (Western University Ontario)

Interested in participating?

Contact Benedikt Schmitz through email: b.schmitz@rug.nl

Tags: Call for Participants
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Tobias Lutzi https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Tobias Lutzi2025-03-17 10:32:212025-03-17 11:57:38Reminder: Quo Vadis Preferential Law Approach? A Survey on the Interpretation of Article 6(2) Rome I Regulation Across EU Member States

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
Link to: Trending Topics in German PIL 2024 (Part 1 – Illegal Gambling and “Volkswagen”) Link to: Trending Topics in German PIL 2024 (Part 1 – Illegal Gambling and “Volkswagen”) Trending Topics in German PIL 2024 (Part 1 – Illegal Gambling and ... Link to: U.S. District Court’s Order in the Venezuelan Deportees Case Was Not Extraterritorial Link to: U.S. District Court’s Order in the Venezuelan Deportees Case Was Not Extraterritorial U.S. District Court’s Order in the Venezuelan Deportees Case Was Not Extr...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top