Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Round-Up of Canadian Conflicts Publications

July 15, 2009/in /by Stephen Pitel
image_pdfimage_print

Readers of this web site might find some of the following publications to be of interest.  I have tried to gather togther recent work by Canadian conflicts scholars.  Please post a comment if you are aware of another piece.

Vaughan Black & Angela Swan, “Concurrent Judicial Jurisdiction: A Race to the Court House or to Judgment?” (2008) 46 C.B.L.J. 292

Joost Blom, “Concurrent Judicial Jurisdiction and Forum Non Conveniens – What is to be Done?” (2009) 47 C.B.L.J. 166

Wayne Gray & Robert Wisner, “The Russians are Coming, But Can They Enforce their Foreign Arbitral Award?” (2009) 47 C.B.L.J. 244

Jacqueline King & Andrew Valentine, “The Structure of Jurisdictional Analysis” (2008) 34 Adv. Q. 416

Kenneth C. MacDonald, Cross-Border Litigation: Interjurisdictional Practice and Procedure (Aurora: Canada Law Book, 2009)

James Mangan, “The Need for Cross-Border Clarity: Recognizing American Class Action Judgments in Canada” (2009) 35 Adv. Q. 375

Tanya Monestier, “Lepine v. Canada Post: Ironing Out Wrinkles in the Interprovincial Enforcement of Class Judgments” (2008) 34 Adv. Q. 499

Austen Parrish, “Comity and Parallel Foreign Proceedings: A Reply to Black and Swan” (2009) 47 C.B.L.J. 209

Nicholas Pengelley, “Alberta Says Nyet! Limitation Act Declares Russian Arbitral Award DOA” (2009) 5 J.P.I.L. 105

Stephen Pitel, “Rome II and Choice of Law for Unjust Enrichment” in John Ahern & William Binchy, The Rome II Regulation on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009) 231

Stephen Pitel, “Choice of Law for Unjust Enrichment: Rome II and the Common Law” [2008] Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht 456

Antonin Pribetic, “Staking Claims Against Foreign Defendants in Canada: Choice of Law and Jurisdictional Issues Arising from the In Personam Exception to the Mocambique Rule for Foreign Immovables” (2009) 35 Adv. Q. 230

Prasanna Ranganathan, “Survivors of Torture, Victims of Law: Reforming State Immunity in Canada by Developing Exceptions for Terrorism and Torture” (2008) 71 Sask. L. Rev. 343

Geneviève Saumier, “Transborder Litigation and Private International Law: The View from Canada” in F. Cafaggi & H.-W. Micklitz, eds., New Frontiers of Consumer Protection: The Interplay between Private and Public Enforcement (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2009) 361

Janet Walker, “Recognizing Multijurisdictional Class Action Judgments Within Canada: Key Questions – Suggested Answers” (2008) 46 C.B.L.J. 450

Janet Walker, “Teck Cominco and the Wisdom of Deferring to the Court First Seised, All Things Being Equal” (2009) 47 C.B.L.J. 192

Tags: Canada, publications
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Stephen Pitel https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Stephen Pitel2009-07-15 17:52:102009-07-15 17:52:10Round-Up of Canadian Conflicts Publications

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Link to: Summer Seminar in Urbino Link to: Summer Seminar in Urbino Summer Seminar in Urbino Link to: Publication. Punitive damages: Common Law and Civil Perspectives Link to: Publication. Punitive damages: Common Law and Civil Perspectives Publication. Punitive damages: Common Law and Civil Perspectives
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top