Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

The Differing Approach to Commercial Litigation in the ECJ and the Courts of England and Wales

February 20, 2007/1 Comment/in /by Martin George
image_pdfimage_print

Anthony Clarke (Master of the Rolls) has also written an article in the European Business Law Review, on “The differing approach to commercial litigation in the European Court of Justice and the courts of England and Wales“. The abstract reads:

Reviews European Court of Justice cases on the allocation of jurisdiction under Council Regulation 44/2001 (the Brussels Regulation), comparing the English courts’ approach. Discusses whether courts can still issue anti-suit injunctions to restrain legal proceedings in other Member States. Contrasts the principle of forum non conveniens with the emphasis on legal certainty, mutual trust and the facilitation of the single internal market under the Brussels Regulation.

Again, those with a subscription can download the article from here. Andrew Dickinson has kindly provided a link to the article, which originally breathed life as a lecture at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies in February 2006. You can download it free of charge.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Martin George https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Martin George2007-02-20 15:18:452007-02-24 12:56:28The Differing Approach to Commercial Litigation in the ECJ and the Courts of England and Wales
1 reply
  1. Andrew Dickinson says:
    February 23, 2007 at 8:34 pm

    Andrew Dickinson wrote:This lecture given at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies in February 2006 can be downloaded for free at:

    http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications_media/speeches/2006/sp230206.htm

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Political Immobilisation of Iranian Diaspora Property: Lex Situs, Human Rights and Public Policy August 22, 2026
  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
Link to: Mance: "Is Europe Aiming to Civilise the Common Law"? Link to: Mance: "Is Europe Aiming to Civilise the Common Law"? Mance: "Is Europe Aiming to Civilise the Common Law"? Link to: The First US Conflicts Restatement Through the Eyes of Old: As Bad as its Reputation? Link to: The First US Conflicts Restatement Through the Eyes of Old: As Bad as its Reputation? The First US Conflicts Restatement Through the Eyes of Old: As Bad as its R...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top