Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Rethinking Family Law Through a European Human Rights Lens: A New Collective Volume

November 9, 2025/2 Comments/in News/by Rui Dias
image_pdfimage_print

What does it mean to respect family life in modern Europe? With families increasingly diverse and cross-border by nature, the concept of family law is undergoing profound legal, cultural, and institutional changes. A newly published academic volume — El Derecho de Familia a la Luz del Derecho Fundamental Europeo al Respeto a la Vida Familiar — offers a rich and timely exploration of this transformation.

Edited by María Victoria Cuartero Rubio and José Manuel Velasco Retamosa, this book brings together leading voices in European family law, private international law, and human rights to examine how the fundamental right to respect for family life (Article 8 ECHR, Article 7 EU Charter) is reshaping family law across jurisdictions.

This collective volume is notable for its interdisciplinary scope and comparative approach. Contributors address legal challenges that sit at the intersection of: Family Law (marriage, parenthood, equality, succession); Private International Law (cross-border family relations, recognition of status); Fundamental Rights Law (interpretation of Article 8 ECHR); European Union Law (Brussels II ter Regulation, work-life balance directive); Family Policy & Socio-Legal Perspectives (gender equality, LGBTQ+ rights, surrogacy).

The book features contributions from a distinguished panel of legal scholars and practitioners, including: Rafael Arenas García (UAB); Katarina Trimmings (University of Aberdeen); Margherita Salvadori (University of Turin); Amélie Benoistel (Paris); Afonso Patrão (University of Coimbra), alongside a wide range of Spanish and international legal academics.

The volume is divided into four thematic parts, each exploring a key area of contemporary family law from a fundamental rights perspective:

1. Evolving Family Models (How are legal systems adapting to non-traditional families, cohabitation, reconstituted households, and gender dynamics within family law?)

2. Equality, Non-Discrimination & Diversity (Topics include discrimination in inheritance, recognition of same-sex parenthood, and the intersection of sexual/gender identity and private life under the ECHR)

3. Identity, Parenthood & Cross-Border Legal Status (Chapters address the legal recognition of parentage, surrogacy, nationality, and the right to personal identity — all within the context of European mobility)

4. European and International Cooperation (Focus on Brussels II ter, forum non conveniens, judicial cooperation, and the cross-border recognition of family rights in an EU context).

While the majority of the chapters are written in Spanish, the volume also includes important contributions in English and French, reflecting the book’s comparative and international character. For example, Katarina Trimmings contributes a chapter in English on Article 8 ECHR and children’s identity rights; Margherita Salvadori writes in English on the Italian ban on surrogacy and its cross-border effects; Amélie Benoistel contributes a chapter in French on reserved heirship and the ECHR.

This volume is more than a scholarly collection — it’s a map of the evolving European legal landscape on family life. Its strength lies in combining legal theory with practical analysis, using the right to family life as a unifying framework across jurisdictions.

For those working i.a. on cross-border custody or parental rights cases, legal recognition of same-sex or surrogate families, harmonisation of family law within the EU, or human rights protections in private family disputes, the book provides important insights.

 

Full text available here:
https://ruidera.uclm.es/server/api/core/bitstreams/7cd3dc93-51aa-4c8f-9df1-142fdd00ede3/content

Tags: books
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Rui Dias https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Rui Dias2025-11-09 19:13:502025-11-10 07:50:15Rethinking Family Law Through a European Human Rights Lens: A New Collective Volume
2 replies
  1. Dr. Hassan Mohsen Elhais says:
    November 10, 2025 at 7:16 am

    This is a very important discussion. Family law is evolving faster than ever, and applying a European Human Rights framework is absolutely the right direction. Families today look very different from traditional structures — and courts need to reflect that diversity with fairness, proportionality and child-centric justice. Any experienced <a href="https://www.alrowaad.ae/
    "Legal Consultation will agree that this lens is becoming increasingly necessary.

    What I really appreciate in this new volume is the effort to connect legal reforms with real life experiences of parents, children and vulnerable family members. European human rights principles can help balance state power with individual dignity — especially in sensitive issues like custody, adoption, domestic violence and cross-border family disputes.

  2. Dr. Hassan Mohsen Elhais says:
    November 10, 2025 at 7:18 am

    This is a very important discussion. Family law is evolving faster than ever, and applying a European Human Rights framework is absolutely the right direction. Families today look very different from traditional structures — and courts need to reflect that diversity with fairness, proportionality and child-centric justice. Any experienced Legal Consultation will agree that this lens is becoming increasingly necessary.

    What I really appreciate in this new volume is the effort to connect legal reforms with real life experiences of parents, children and vulnerable family members. European human rights principles can help balance state power with individual dignity — especially in sensitive issues like custody, adoption, domestic violence and cross-border family disputes.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Link to: Revue critique de droit international privé – Issue 2025/3 Link to: Revue critique de droit international privé – Issue 2025/3 Revue critique de droit international privé – Issue 2025/3 Link to: ‘Paramount clause’ in a bill of lading as choice of law under Rome I – the Supreme Court of the Netherlands in Airgas USA v Universal Africa Lines Link to: ‘Paramount clause’ in a bill of lading as choice of law under Rome I – the Supreme Court of the Netherlands in Airgas USA v Universal Africa Lines ‘Paramount clause’ in a bill of lading as choice of law under Rome I –...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top