Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Reminder: Quo Vadis Preferential Law Approach? A Survey on the Interpretation of Article 6(2) Rome I Regulation Across EU Member States

March 17, 2025/in News/by Tobias Lutzi
image_pdfimage_print

Benedikt Schmitz (University of Groningen) has kindly shared the following reminder of his Call for Participants with us.

The project concerns the interpretation of Article 6 (2) Rome I Regulation in the EU Member States and is very limited in nature. Time commitments are therefore very limited. Click here for more information.

We are still looking for scholars from Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxemburg, Malta, Romania, and Slovenia. Danish scholars may also participate on the basis of Article 5(2) Rome Convention.

The team currently consists of established scholars from 15 (former) EU Member States:

  • Austria: Andreas Schwartze (Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck)
  • Belgium: Cedric Vanleenhove (Universiteit Gent)
  • Bulgaria: Ilia Lassin (Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski)
  • Cyprus: Nicholas Mouttotos (Universität Bremen)
  • Germany: Benedikt Schmitz (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)
  • Greece: Kostas A. Rokas (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
  • Hungary: Ferenc Szilágyi (Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem Budapest)
  • Lithuania: Katarzyna Bogdziewicz (Mykolo Romerio universitetas Vilnius)
  • Netherlands: Benedikt Schmitz (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)
  • Poland: Anna Wysocka-Bar (Uniwersytet Jagiello?ski Kraków)
  • Portugal: Anabela Gonçalves (Universidade do Minho)
  • Slovakia: Dominika Moravcová (Trnavská univerzita v Trnave)
  • Spain: Anna María Ruiz Martín (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya) & Beatriz Añoveros Terradas (Universitat de Barcelona)
  • Sweden: Gunnar Bramstång (Lunds Universitet)
  • UK: Ross Pey (Western University Ontario)

Interested in participating?

Contact Benedikt Schmitz through email: b.schmitz@rug.nl

Tags: Call for Participants
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Tobias Lutzi https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Tobias Lutzi2025-03-17 10:32:212025-03-17 11:57:38Reminder: Quo Vadis Preferential Law Approach? A Survey on the Interpretation of Article 6(2) Rome I Regulation Across EU Member States

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • From Symbolism to Substance: Comity and Judicial Reform in South Africa’s Foreign Judgments Regime September 15, 2026
  • Persistent and Reasonable Efforts in the Field of Cross-Border Service of Documents. Continuation or Stay of Proceedings? September 12, 2026
  • Speaking for the Dead: Idziski and the Forum for Post-Mortem Likeness Claims September 7, 2026
  • Book Review: Andrew Dickinson and Alexander Thompson, The State Immunity Act 1978 (OUP, 2025) September 7, 2026
  • Political Immobilisation of Iranian Diaspora Property: Lex Situs, Human Rights and Public Policy August 22, 2026
  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
Link to: Trending Topics in German PIL 2024 (Part 1 – Illegal Gambling and “Volkswagen”) Link to: Trending Topics in German PIL 2024 (Part 1 – Illegal Gambling and “Volkswagen”) Trending Topics in German PIL 2024 (Part 1 – Illegal Gambling and ... Link to: U.S. District Court’s Order in the Venezuelan Deportees Case Was Not Extraterritorial Link to: U.S. District Court’s Order in the Venezuelan Deportees Case Was Not Extraterritorial U.S. District Court’s Order in the Venezuelan Deportees Case Was Not Extr...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top