September 2024 Update: List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments
September 2024 Update: List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments
Written by Dr. Meng Yu and Dr. Guodong Du, co-founders of China Justice Observer*
On 22 September 2024, China Justice Observer released the 2024 version of the List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments.[1] To date, we have collected 109 cases involving China and 26 foreign States and regions. (Note: Foreign divorce judgments are excluded in the Case List.)
The Case List was issued on July 16, 2019, and is updated annually. The 2020 update[2], 2022 update[3], and 2023 update[4] were also posted on Conflictoflaws.net.
The full version of the 2024 List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments is available here.[5]
The key features of the updated list are:
- The List comprises 26 concise reports for each jurisdiction, together with a chart of bilateral judicial assistance treaties which China has concluded with 39 States, of which 35 bilateral treaties include judgment enforcement clauses.
- A total of eleven newly added cases involve one treaty jurisdiction – Russia (one case), [6]and six non-treaty jurisdictions, namely, Australia (two cases),[7] Canada (three cases),[8] Japan (one case),[9] Malaysia (one case),[10] Singapore (two cases), [11] and Thailand (one case).[12]
- Please note that in Guangxi Nanning China Travel Service Co., Ltd. v. Orient Thai Airlines Co., Ltd. (2023) Gui 71 Xie Wai Ren No. 1,[13] a local Chinese court in Nanning, Guangxi Province, ruled to recognize and enforce a Thai monetary judgment in 2024. Apart from being the first case of enforcing Thai monetary judgments in China, it is also the first publicly reported case confirming a reciprocal relationship based on “presumptive reciprocity”, a concept which was outlined in the Nanning Statement signed by the judiciary of China and the ASEAN countries in 2017. This decision is also interesting because it is unlikely, if not impossible, to have foreign judgments recognized and enforced in Thailand.
- Another noteworthy case is In re Shanghai International Corporation (2021) Hu 03 Xie Wai Ren No.1, [14] where the Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Court ruled to recognize the Tokyo District Court’s decision to commence civil rehabilitation proceedings and the order appointing the supervisor. This marks not only the first time that China has recognized a Japanese court’s decision in a bankruptcy procedure, but also the first time that China has recognized a Japanese court judgment, signaling a potential shift in the traditionally strained mutual recognition landscape between China and Japan.
- Other newly added cases, be it foreign judgments to be enforced in China or Chinese judgments to be enforced in foreign jurisdictions, provide a valuable comparative perspective on key issues in the eyes of courts from different jurisdictions, such as the enforceability of Chinese civil settlement statements (also known as “civil mediation judgments”, cf. different views in Wei v. Li 2019 BCCA 114 (Canada)[15] and Shi Wen Yue v Shi Minjiu & Anor [2016] SGHC 137 (Singapore) [16]), finality (Canada), [17] proof of foreign judgments (Malaysia),[18] due process in absentia judgments (Singapore,[19] Russia[20]), procedural fairness/natural justice issues arising from alternative service of process (cf. Zhou v Jing [2023] NSWSC 214 (Australia),[21] Yin v Wu [2023] VSCA 130 (Australia)[22]).
- Each case has been reviewed and more details, such as the grounds, the case numbers, and causes of action, have been added.
- Case analyses have been aggregated under the country tags since 2022, so it is now easier to track down relevant cases, together with their information and analyses, in each country/region report. For example, under the tag ‘US-China Judgments Recognition and Enforcement’[23], one can find relevant case analyses involving mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments between the US and China.
As always, we endeavor to collect all Chinese court decisions involving the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments (“REFJ”), and foreign counterparts concerning the recognition and enforcement of Chinese judgments. The Case List is made available for our readers to build reasonable expectations on REFJ in China.
The Case List is continually updated with new reports. Case information, comments, and suggestions are most welcome. Please feel free to contact Ms. Meng YU via e-mail at meng.yu@chinajusticeobserver.com.
*We would like to thank the following persons/institutions that shared thoughts and valuable information with us:
Dr. Béligh Elbalti, Associate Professor, Graduate School of Law and Politics, Osaka University, Japan; Dr. ZHANG Wenliang, Associate Professor, School of Law, Renmin University of China; Dr. SU Xiaoling, Lawyer at Beijing DHH Law Firm; Mr. WANG Chengjie, Lawyer at Allbright Law Offices (Shanghai);Wonbanglaw; Ms. Renee M Wong, Attorney at Goldberger and Dubin PC (New York); Dr. WANG Yahan, Associate Professor, Henan University School of Law; Mr. Angus Ni, Litigation attorney at AFN Law PLLC (Seattle); Asian Business Law Institute (ABLI); Ms. Dawei Gongsun, Partner at DGW Kramer LLP (New York).
[1] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/september-2024-update-list-of-china-s-cases-on-recognition-of-foreign-judgments
[2] https://conflictoflaws.net/2020/out-now-list-of-chinas-cases-on-recognition-of-foreign-judgments/
[3] https://conflictoflaws.net/2022/august-2022-update-list-of-chinas-cases-on-recognition-of-foreign-judgments/
[4] https://conflictoflaws.net/2023/august-2023-update-list-of-chinas-cases-on-recognition-of-foreign-judgments/
[5] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/list-of-chinas-cases-on-recognition-of-foreign-judgments
[6] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/chinese-court-refuses-to-recognize-russian-judgment-due-to-due-process
[7] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/t/recognizing-and-enforcing-australian-judgments-in-china
[8] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/t/canada-china-judgments-recognition-and-enforcement
[9] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/decoding-the-turning-point-a-closer-look-at-chinas-recognition-of-japanese-bankruptcy
[10] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/malaysia-dismisses-application-to-enforce-chinese-judgment-due-to-procedural-irregularities-in-2023
[11] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/t/singapore-china-judgments-recognition-and-enforcement
[12] https://conflictoflaws.net/2024/first-thai-monetary-judgment-enforced-in-china-highlighting-presumptive-reciprocity-in-china-asean-region/
[13] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/first-thai-monetary-judgment-enforced-in-china,-highlighting-presumptive-reciprocity-in-china-asean-region
[14] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/decoding-the-turning-point-a-closer-look-at-chinas-recognition-of-japanese-bankruptcy
[15] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/canadian-court-enforces-chinese-civil-settlement-statement-mediation-judgment-in-2019
[16] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/chinese-civil-settlement-statements-enforceable-in-singapore
[17] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/chinese-judgment-finality-in-doubt-in-canada
[18] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/malaysia-dismisses-application-to-enforce-chinese-judgment-due-to-procedural-irregularities-in-2023
[19] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/china-wenzhou-court-recognizes-a-singapore-monetary-judgment
[20] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/chinese-court-refuses-to-recognize-russian-judgment-due-to-due-process
[21] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/a-chinese-judgment-denied-enforcement-by-court-of-nsw-australia,-due-to-defective-service-by-post%ef%bc%9f
[22] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/a-chinese-judgment-denied-enforcement-in-australia-as-public-announcement-against-natural-justice
[23] https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/t/recognizing-and-enforcing-american-judgments-in-china
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!