Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

New Hungarian Private International Law Act

April 12, 2017/6 Comments/in /by Giesela Ruehl
image_pdfimage_print

By Tamás Szabados, LL.M. (UCL), PhD (ELTE), Senior Lecturer at the Eötvös Loránd University (Hungary)

On 11 April 2017, the new Hungarian Private International Law Act (Act XXVIII of 2017), adopted earlier by the Hungarian Parliament, was promulgated. The new Act will enter into force on 1 January 2018 and will fully replace the decree-law of 1979 that currently regulates private international law. The adoption of the new Act was justified by the economic and social changes that occurred since then. The drafting process was based on extensive comparative research and the drafters also paid attention to recent developments in EU private international law.

The new Private International Law Act covers the determination of the applicable law, jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of foreign decisions as well as other aspects of international civil procedure. The new Private International Law Act introduces some changes in comparison to the rules currently in force.

The General Part deals with certain questions not regulated previously: application of the law of states having more than one legal system, overriding mandatory provisions and changes in the circumstances which determine the governing law. As a novelty, the General Part also contains a general escape clause: if, based on the circumstances of the case, it is obvious that the case is substantially more strongly connected with a law other than the law designated by virtue of the Act, the court may exceptionally apply this law. In addition, a general subsidiary choice of law rule provides that, if the new Act does not contain a specific choice of law rule for a legal relationship that is otherwise covered by the Act, the law of the state will apply with which that relationship is most strongly connected.

The Special Part of the Act extends equally to certain issues which were not regulated earlier, such as the (restricted) freedom to choose the applicable law in property matters for spouses and (registered) partners or the determination of the law applicable to illegally exported cultural property.

Jurisdictional rules as well as the provisions on recognition and enforcement of decisions have been restructured and divided into general and special provisions (such as the rules on matters involving an economic interest and matters concerning family law and personal status).

The text of the New Hungarian Private International Law Act is available (in Hungarian language) here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giesela Ruehl https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giesela Ruehl2017-04-12 22:34:152017-04-12 22:34:15New Hungarian Private International Law Act
6 replies
  1. Ennio Piovesani says:
    April 13, 2017 at 8:26 am

    Does anyone have any clue as to where are the provisions governing prorogation of juridsiction by agreement in the Act?

    Thanks in advance.

    Ennio Piovesani

  2. Tamás Szabados says:
    April 13, 2017 at 2:12 pm

    Dear Ennio,

    Prorogation of jurisdiction is regulated by Section 99 concerning matters involving an economic interest. Section 99 contains rules, among others, on:
    – the form of jurisdiction agreements;
    – determination of the applicable law to the existence and validity of choice of court agreements;
    – separability of jurisdiction clauses; and
    – exclusivity of choice of court agreements.

  3. Ennio Piovesani says:
    April 13, 2017 at 4:57 pm

    Dear Tomás,

    Thank you very much! I’ll have that article translated!

    Best regards,

    Ennio

  4. Yuan wentao says:
    May 7, 2017 at 6:46 am

    Is the text of the New Hungarian Private International Law Act available in English version ?

  5. Tamás Szabados says:
    May 7, 2017 at 1:49 pm

    Dear Wentao,

    At the moment, I am not aware of a translation (but probably the new PIL Act will be later translated in English).

  6. Yuan wentao says:
    May 8, 2017 at 7:08 am

    Dear Tamás
    Thank you very much!
    Best
    wentao

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Link to: Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht (NIPR) Vol. 35-1 2017 – with Free Access to English Contribution Link to: Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht (NIPR) Vol. 35-1 2017 – with Free Access to English Contribution Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht (NIPR) Vol. 35-1 2017 – with Free... Link to: Séminaire de Droit Comparé et Européen- Summer 2017, Urbino Link to: Séminaire de Droit Comparé et Européen- Summer 2017, Urbino Séminaire de Droit Comparé et Européen- Summer 2017, Urbino
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top