Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Ancel and Cuniberti on One Sided Jurisdiction Clauses

March 11, 2013/3 Comments/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

Pascal Ancel and I (University of Luxembourg) have posted One Sided Jurisdiction Clauses – a Casenote on Rothschild on SSRN.

This is a short casenote of the decision of the French Supreme Court of September 26th, 2012, which found that one-sided jurisdiction clauses are void for being binding on one party only, and are thus contrary to the purpose of Article 23 of the Brussels I Regulation. The first part of the note discusses the private international law aspects of the case. The second part discusses the application of the francophone doctrine of potestativite in the context of jurisdiction clauses.

Note: downloadable document is in French.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2013-03-11 16:50:022013-03-11 16:50:02Ancel and Cuniberti on One Sided Jurisdiction Clauses
3 replies
  1. Ralf says:
    March 11, 2013 at 10:16 pm

    Richard Fetiman commented on the same judgments in the newest issue of the Cambridge Law Journal; see http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8857945&fulltextType=CR&fileId=S0008197313000251

  2. Henry Smith says:
    March 14, 2013 at 5:21 pm

    Does anyone have a copy of the Bulgarian judgment which follows Rothschild, even in Bulgarian?

  3. Polina Pavlova says:
    March 15, 2013 at 8:36 pm

    The full text (in Bulgarian) of the judgment of the Bulgarian Supreme Court of Cassation from September 2nd, 2011 can be found at
    http://domino.vks.bg/bcap/scc/webdata.nsf/Keywords/C8F68993563DD5FFC22578FF00499C60

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Link to: Hague Conference’s 2nd Guide on Accreditation under Adoption Convention Link to: Hague Conference’s 2nd Guide on Accreditation under Adoption Convention Hague Conference’s 2nd Guide on Accreditation under Adoption Conventi... Link to: Fourth Issue of 2012’s Revue Critique de Droit International Prive Link to: Fourth Issue of 2012’s Revue Critique de Droit International Prive Fourth Issue of 2012’s Revue Critique de Droit International Prive
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top