Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

New UAM “Julio d. González Campos” Seminar (13 April)

March 30, 2012/in /by Marta Requejo
image_pdfimage_print

The Private International Law Department of the UAM (Universidad Autónoma, Madrid) is happy to announce a new edition of the so called “Julio D. González Campos” series of seminars on April 13, with Matthias Lehmann (Professor of Private International Law at the Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, and Director of the Institute of Economic Law, and Eva Lein, Herbert Smith Senior Research Fellow of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law) as speakers.

The first session will begin at 11:00 with Ms. Eva Lein’s intervention, entitled “Which Law Should Apply to an Assignment of Claims? – The Reform of Article 14 Rome I Regulation”. The second lecture, by Prof. Lehmann, is programmed for 12:15, under the title “Do We Need A Reform of the Rome I Regulation Regarding the Law Applicable to Financial Torts?”. Both sessions will be in English.

All those interested are welcome. Venue: Seminar V (Julio D. González Campos, 4th Floor), Faculty of Law, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Marta Requejo https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Marta Requejo2012-03-30 04:57:052012-03-29 10:02:58New UAM “Julio d. González Campos” Seminar (13 April)

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: Saumier on Forum Non Conveniens in Quebec Link to: Saumier on Forum Non Conveniens in Quebec Saumier on Forum Non Conveniens in Quebec Link to: Rühl on European Sales Law and PIL Link to: Rühl on European Sales Law and PIL Rühl on European Sales Law and PIL
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top