Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Implied Choice of Law in International Contracts

September 15, 2012/in /by Marta Requejo
image_pdfimage_print

Manuel Penadés Fons has just published a new book on the implied choice of law in international contracts, entitled Elección tácita de ley en los contratos internacionales (Thomson Reuters Aranzadi).

Abstract provided by the author:

The autonomy of the parties to choose the law applicable to their international commercial contracts does not always manifest through an express clause in the agreement. This silence leads occasionally to litigation over the possibility that the parties exercised such freedom, even though it was not explicitly reflected in the contract. Despite the harmonised solution provided to this issue by the European legislation, practice shows that the answer given by the courts of different Member States is substantially divergent. This reality makes the question highly controversial and unpredictable in the context of international commercial litigation. The book at hand studies the theoretical underpinnings of the institution and explores the criteria used by European caselaw under the Rome Convention and the Rome I Regulation, offering valuable professional guidance to deal with the question of implied choice of law before national and arbitral tribunals.

 

Summary (click here for whole table of contents)

I.- Introduction: Party autonomy under the Rome I Regulation

II.- Conceptual delimitation: Implied choice of law

III.- Practical delimitation: Implications of the study

IV.- The History and Status Quo of Implied Choice of Law in the European Union

V.- The Search for the Real Intention of the Parties

VI.- Conclusions

Manuel Penadés Fons, LLM London School of Economics, teaches Private International Law at the University of Valencia.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Marta Requejo https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Marta Requejo2012-09-15 05:30:002012-09-14 18:30:52Implied Choice of Law in International Contracts

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: The Court of Justice – holiday over Link to: The Court of Justice – holiday over The Court of Justice – holiday over Link to: Hague Conference Seeks New Secretary General Link to: Hague Conference Seeks New Secretary General Hague Conference Seeks New Secretary General
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top