Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Third Preliminary Draft of the CLIP Principles

September 20, 2010/in /by Ivana Kunda
image_pdfimage_print

The European Max-Planck Group for Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property has recently published the Third Drat of their Principles for Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property, which is available for download here. This version contains amended and supplemented rules contained in the First Draft of April 2009 (reported here), and the Second Draft of June 2009. The initial rules were exposed to the scrutiny of the scholars and practitioners outside the Group and the Third Draft is partially the result thereof.

Compared to the Second Draft, the Third Draft introduces changes, some just redrafts and some more substantial modifications, with respect to following issues:

    Scope
    General jurisdiction
    Jurisdiction for infringements
    Jurisdiction for multiple defendants
    Jurisdiction for declaratory actions
    Jurisdiction for preliminary and protective measures
    General provisions on jurisdiction
    Scope of injunction
    Cooperation in multistate proceedings
    Congruent and preliminary proceedings
    Law applicable in the absence of choice
    Law applicable to security interests in IP
    Law applicable to ubiquitous infringements
    General rule on recognition and enforcement

It is interesting to note that the Group is having profound doubts as to the choice of the choice-of-law rules for security interests in IPRs, and three versions are currently being considered.

The CLIP website still contains the invitation for all to make suggestions or advance critical remarks to the members of the Group. However, any such comments wishing to have an effect on the text of the Principles would probably be appreciated sooner rather than later since the Group has announced the plan to publish the final version of the Principles together with comments in 2011.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Ivana Kunda https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Ivana Kunda2010-09-20 11:25:032010-09-20 11:25:03Third Preliminary Draft of the CLIP Principles

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
Link to: Surrogate motherhood and Spanish homosexual couple (III) Link to: Surrogate motherhood and Spanish homosexual couple (III) Surrogate motherhood and Spanish homosexual couple (III) Link to: A Study on the Private International Law Aspects of International Surrogacy Agreements Link to: A Study on the Private International Law Aspects of International Surrogacy Agreements A Study on the Private International Law Aspects of International Surrogacy...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top