Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

“The ECJ and the end of the law”

March 4, 2010/1 Comment/in /by Marta Requejo
image_pdfimage_print

The Autonomous University of Barcelona is organizing a Seminar of Professors under the suggestive title “The ECJ and the end of the law”. The meeting will gather professors of several disciplines – Labor law, Financial Law, International public and private Law-, in order to discuss some of the most controversial decisions of the Court of Luxembourg. The Private International Law presentation shall be borne by Prof. Rafael Arenas Garcia, from the Autonomous University. The seminar is scheduled for March 18, beginning at 10 am and extending until 14 am. It will be held at the Sala de Juntes of the Faculty of Law in Building B – UAB 08193 – Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona. Admission is free and no registration is required. Spanish and Catalan will be spoken.

(The final program may be consulted here)

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Marta Requejo https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Marta Requejo2010-03-04 17:53:522010-03-04 17:53:52“The ECJ and the end of the law”
1 reply

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
Link to: Mourre on Hess’ Guest Editorial Link to: Mourre on Hess’ Guest Editorial Mourre on Hess’ Guest Editorial Link to: Latest Issue of “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (2/2010) Link to: Latest Issue of “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (2/2010) Latest Issue of “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts”...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top