Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

China’s First Statute on Choice of Law – German Translation

November 30, 2010/1 Comment/in /by Veronika Gaertner
image_pdfimage_print

Following Gilles’ post of 3 November, Christian Heinze (Hamburg) kindly brought to my attention the German translation of the Chinese Statute on Choice of Law. The translation by Knut Benjamin Pißler (Max Planck Institute for Comparative and Private International Law, Hamburg) can be found here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Veronika Gaertner https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Veronika Gaertner2010-11-30 05:34:062010-11-30 05:34:06China’s First Statute on Choice of Law – German Translation
1 reply
  1. Knut Benjamin Pissler says:
    December 1, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    Thanks, Veronika, for pointing to my translation. I am very open for comments and improvement suggestions!
    Kind regards
    Knut Benjamin Pissler
    ——————————-
    Dr. iur., M.A. (Sinology)
    Senior Research Fellow
    Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law
    Mittelweg 187
    D-20148 Hamburg
    Tel.: +49-40-41900-202
    Fax: +49-40-41900-288
    Web: http://www.mpipriv.de
    http://www.pissler.de

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
Link to: EP Workshop on Civil Justice: “How to facilitate the life of European families and citizens?” Link to: EP Workshop on Civil Justice: “How to facilitate the life of European families and citizens?” EP Workshop on Civil Justice: “How to facilitate the life of European... Link to: New Edition of Clavel’s Droit International Privé Link to: New Edition of Clavel’s Droit International Privé New Edition of Clavel’s Droit International Privé
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top