Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Brussels I Regulation – The UK Parliament has its say

August 29, 2009/in /by Andrew Dickinson
image_pdfimage_print

The House of Lords’ influential European Union Committee (chaired by Lord Mance) has published a report on the Commission’s Green Paper on the Brussels I Regulation.  The report scrutinises the Green Paper, in light of evidence presented by representatives of the UK Ministry of Justice (Lord Bach and Oliver Parker) and Richard Fentiman of Cambridge University, and considers all of the topics raised by the Commission (and discussed on these pages).  The evidence is appended at the back of the report.

The Committee’s conclusion (in contrast, for example, to its view on the proposed Rome II Regulation) is favourable:

We very much welcome the Commission’s initiative in producing the Report and the proposals outlined in the Green Paper. While the Regulation has been successful, in particular by introducing clear common rules, there have undoubtedly been areas where some of the rules have, in practice, opened up the possibility for abuse contrary to the interests of justice. This opportunity should be taken to reform the rules with the aim of minimising abuse and to make other useful reforms. We hope the Commission will, following the conclusion of its consultation, move quickly to bring forward proposals to amend the Regulation.

The report is an important contribution to the debate surrounding the proposed reforms to the Brussels I Regulation, and emphasises the need to extend the consultation process beyond any Proposal by the Commission to allow all stakeholders to contribute to the improvement of this, the central instrument of European private international law.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Andrew Dickinson https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Andrew Dickinson2009-08-29 09:10:142009-08-29 09:10:14Brussels I Regulation – The UK Parliament has its say

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
Link to: BIICL event: Lis Pendens in International Litigation Link to: BIICL event: Lis Pendens in International Litigation BIICL event: Lis Pendens in International Litigation Link to: Foreign-Domiciled Testators: Jurisdiction over Family Maintenance Claims Link to: Foreign-Domiciled Testators: Jurisdiction over Family Maintenance Claims Foreign-Domiciled Testators: Jurisdiction over Family Maintenance Claims
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top