Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Australia to accede to Hague Convention on Service Abroad

July 22, 2009/4 Comments/in /by Perry Herzfeld
image_pdfimage_print

On 25 June 2009, the Commonwealth Attorney General tabled the Hague Convention on Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters 1965 in Parliament.  This is the first step to Australia’s becoming a party to the Convention.  In anticipation of that, there have been amendments to the rules of the Federal Court and those of the State Supreme Courts (see eg Victoria) relating to service under the Convention, which will commence on the day the Convention enters force in Australia.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Perry Herzfeld https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Perry Herzfeld2009-07-22 13:53:552009-07-22 13:53:55Australia to accede to Hague Convention on Service Abroad
4 replies
  1. DAH says:
    July 25, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Well, nearly. It is slightly premature to say that Australia has acceded. Australia still has yet to deposit its instrument of accession with the depository, and its accession must not be objected to by any other ratifying State within a further six months.

  2. Dr. Oliver L. Knöfel says:
    August 4, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Does anyone have information on New Zealand preparing to accede to the Hague Evidence Convention of 1970?

    The new Evidence Act of NZ apparently takes care for NZ applying the Convention, but will NZ accede (or has it already)?
    Thank you very much!

  3. Albert says:
    April 12, 2010 at 12:41 am

    I would note that, as far as I can see, Australia has still not yet implemented the convention.

  4. Perry Herzfeld says:
    April 12, 2010 at 12:52 am

    Australia acceded to the Convention on 15 March 2010 and it is to enter into force on 1 November 2010: see http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/agd.nsf/Page/Internationalcivilprocedure_ServiceofforeigncourtprocessinAustralia. As I noted in the original post, court rules have been amended in anticipation of this, with the amendments to commence when the Convention enters into force.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: ECJ: Judgments in “Hadadi” and “Zuid-Chemie BV” Link to: ECJ: Judgments in “Hadadi” and “Zuid-Chemie BV” ECJ: Judgments in “Hadadi” and “Zuid-Chemie BV” Link to: Publications on International Surrogate Motherhood Link to: Publications on International Surrogate Motherhood Publications on International Surrogate Motherhood
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top