Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Swiss Institute of Comparative Law: Prof. Sturm’s Lecture on “Le nom en droit international privé”

May 14, 2008/in /by Giorgio Buono
image_pdfimage_print

On Thursday 15 May 2008, at 17.00, the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law (ISDC, Lausanne) will host a lecture (in French) by Prof. Fritz Sturm (University of Lausanne) on “Le nom en droit international privé” (“Name in Private International Law”).

The lecture is one of the monthly seminars on private international law and comparative law organized by the ISDC (“Les jeudis de l’ISDC”). A small fee is required for participation (free for students and academics). Further information (and the full list of seminars) is available here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giorgio Buono https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giorgio Buono2008-05-14 18:25:052008-05-14 18:25:05Swiss Institute of Comparative Law: Prof. Sturm’s Lecture on “Le nom en droit international privé”

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: A Legislative Solution For Cross-Border Defamation Claims Link to: A Legislative Solution For Cross-Border Defamation Claims A Legislative Solution For Cross-Border Defamation Claims Link to: Annotation on ECJ Judgment in “FBTO Schadeverzekeringen” Link to: Annotation on ECJ Judgment in “FBTO Schadeverzekeringen” Annotation on ECJ Judgment in “FBTO Schadeverzekeringen”
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top