Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Italian conference papers on ‘Rome I’ Proposal

February 11, 2007/in /by Giorgio Buono
image_pdfimage_print

An Italian book has been recently published which collects a number of papers dealing with old and new questions raised by the modernisation of the 1980 Rome Convention and its conversion into a Community regulation (Rome I: see our dedicated page here).

Here’s a short presentation, kindly provided by Pietro Franzina (University of Ferrara), editor of the volume:

Some fourteen papers, covering a wide range of issues relating to the 2005 Commission Proposal for an EC Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I), have just been published by CEDAM under the title “La legge applicabile ai contratti nella proposta di regolamento Roma I” (“The law applicable to contracts according to the Rome I proposed Regulation”), following a conference organised in 2006 by the Faculty of Law of the University of Ferrara.

Opened by an introductory paper by Professor Francesco Salerno (University of Ferrara) and Professor Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo (Catholic University of Milan), the book (in Italian) includes contributions on the following topics:

  • the role of the European Court of Justice and the interpretation of the proposed regulation (Paolo Bertoli, University of Milan);
  • the choice of ‘principles and rules of the substantive law of contract recognised internationally or in the Community’ as the law applicable to contractual obligations (Fabrizio Marrella, University of Venice);
  • the law applicable to contracts in the absence of choice and the relation between the proposed regulation and international conventions bearing uniform rules (Bernardo Cortese, University of Padua);
  • the law applicable to consumer contracts and individual employment contracts (Giuseppina Pizzolante, University of Bari, and Paolo Venturi, University of Siena, respectively);
  • the law applicable to agency (Pietro Franzina, University of Ferrara);
  • ordre public and mandatory rules (Giacomo Biagioni, University of Cagliari);
  • the law applicable to voluntary assignment of rights (with two different papers, by Anna Gardella, Catholic University of Milan, and Antonio Leandro, University of Bari);
  • consequences for the Italian system of Private International Law deriving from the conversion of the Rome Convention into a Community instrument (Fabrizio Marongiu Buonaiuti, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’).

Title: “La legge applicabile ai contratti nella proposta di regolamento Roma I” (P. Franzina, editor). ISBN: 978-88-13-26251-5. Pages: XII-180. Available from CEDAM.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giorgio Buono https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giorgio Buono2007-02-11 16:11:462007-02-12 11:49:36Italian conference papers on ‘Rome I’ Proposal

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Link to: U.S. Federal Courts and Foreign Patents: Recent Decisions Affecting the Global Harmonization of Patent Law Link to: U.S. Federal Courts and Foreign Patents: Recent Decisions Affecting the Global Harmonization of Patent Law U.S. Federal Courts and Foreign Patents: Recent Decisions Affecting the Global... Link to: Conferences on Conflicts at the Cour de Cassation in March Link to: Conferences on Conflicts at the Cour de Cassation in March Conferences on Conflicts at the Cour de Cassation in March
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top