Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Happy Christmas / Holidays

December 22, 2007/in /by Martin George
image_pdfimage_print

On the assumption that no more items will be posted to Conflict of Laws .net before 25th December, and possibly 1st January (although we did, in fact, churn out quite a few posts in the festive period last year), I would like to wish everyone a Happy Christmas / Holiday, and a very Happy New Year. I hope everyone returns in 2008 thoroughly refreshed and recharged, helped along by a diet of turkey, fruit cake, mince pies and plenty of wine.

I would like to quickly mention our team of 15 National Editors. If you find this website useful and/or interesting, it is because of their expertise, dedication and generosity. 325 items on new cases, legislation, publications, news, reviews or whatever else have been posted on Conflict of Laws .net during 2007, which represents a considerable amount of time and effort. We have several more scholars joining the team in 2008. If your country is not represented on Conflict of Laws .net, and you would be interested in becoming an Editor, I would be delighted to hear from you.

Best wishes, Martin George.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Martin George https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Martin George2007-12-22 23:16:162007-12-25 14:33:30Happy Christmas / Holidays

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Political Immobilisation of Iranian Diaspora Property: Lex Situs, Human Rights and Public Policy August 22, 2026
  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
Link to: Some Political Drama in the Conflict of Laws in Canada Link to: Some Political Drama in the Conflict of Laws in Canada Some Political Drama in the Conflict of Laws in Canada Link to: The Long-Arm of the USPTO: A Significant Decision (and a Significant Dissent) from the Fourth Circuit Link to: The Long-Arm of the USPTO: A Significant Decision (and a Significant Dissent) from the Fourth Circuit The Long-Arm of the USPTO: A Significant Decision (and a Significant Dissent)...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top