Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

EU Draft Reform Treaty (Part 2): a Detailed Analysis of the New EC/EU Treaties

August 21, 2007/2 Comments/in /by Giorgio Buono
image_pdfimage_print

Following swiftly on from our previous post on the amendments provided by the Draft Reform Treaty to the provisions dealing with judicial cooperation in civil matters, we would like to point out a very detailed analysis of the entire text of the Treaties, prepared by Prof. Steve Peers (University of Essex) and published on the statewatch.org website. The analysis is divided in several parts, each consisting of an article by article comparison, with comments, of the text resulting from the Draft Reform Treaty, the current version of the TEC/TEU and the 2004 Constitutional Treaty. The new Title IV of the future Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the “Area of Freedom, Security and Justice”, is the subject of the Analysis no. 1 (Justice and Home Affairs issues).

Here’s a presentation by the author, including a list of the various parts of the analysis (the .pdf files can be downloaded from the home page of the project):

In order to further public understanding of and debate upon the draft Reform Treaty, the following Statewatch analyses make the text of the draft Treaty comprehensible, by setting out the entire texts of the existing TEU and TEC and showing precisely how those texts would be amended by the draft Treaty. There are explanatory notes on the impact of each substantive amendment to the Treaties, and each analysis includes general comments, giving an overview of the changes and pointing out exactly which provisions of the draft Reform Treaty were taken from the Constitutional Treaty, and which provisions are different from the Constitutional Treaty.

There are 3 analyses, divided into ten parts.

Analysis no. 1

  • focusses on the issue of Justice and Home Affairs

Analysis no. 2 is the amended text of the TEU, and is divided into 2 parts:

  • the non-foreign policy part of the Treaty (basic principles and key institutional rules of the EU) and
  • the foreign policy part of that Treaty

Analysis no. 3 is the amended text of the TEC, and is divided into seven parts more or less following the structure of the Treaty:

  • Part One of the Treaty on general provisions
  • Part Two on non-discrimination and citizenship
  • half of Part Three on the internal market and competition (except for the JHA clauses, which are the subject of analysis no. 1)
  • the second half of Part Three, on other internal EU policies (such as social policy, monetary union and environment policy)
  • Parts Four and Five, on the associated territories and external relations (including trade and development policy)
  • Part Six, on the institutional rules (including the rules on the political institutions, the Court of Justice and the ‘flexibility’ rules)
  • Part Seven, the final provisions

(Thanks to Allard Knook, of the ECJBlog, for the tip off)

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giorgio Buono https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giorgio Buono2007-08-21 22:03:222007-08-21 22:36:50EU Draft Reform Treaty (Part 2): a Detailed Analysis of the New EC/EU Treaties
2 replies
  1. gino says:
    November 10, 2008 at 9:30 pm

    Dear sir/madam,

    The links to statewatch site do not work. I really need those analysis. Could you plzzzzz send them to me by email? I would really be gratefull.
    I look forward to your answer.

    Kind regards,

    Gino

  2. Martin George says:
    November 11, 2008 at 9:15 am

    Gino,

    The links do work. Try a different computer if you’re having trouble on yours.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: Brussels II bis: Its Impact and Application in the Member States Link to: Brussels II bis: Its Impact and Application in the Member States Brussels II bis: Its Impact and Application in the Member States Link to: Comity and the Recognition of Foreign Judgments in Long Beach v Global Witness Link to: Comity and the Recognition of Foreign Judgments in Long Beach v Global Witness Comity and the Recognition of Foreign Judgments in Long Beach v Global Witn...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top