Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Significant Reform of Japanese Private International Law

October 11, 2006/2 Comments/in /by Martin George
image_pdfimage_print

The most significant reform of Japanese private international law for more than a century has been completed with the enactment of a new Act. The new Act, Ho no Tekiyo ni Kansuru Tsusoku Ho, will come into effect on 1st January 2007. The reform is far-reaching and covers, inter alia, contract, tort, unjust enrichment, and assignment of rights.

For further details, see Koji Takahashi, “A Major Reform of Japanese Private International Law” (2006) 2 Journal of Private International Law 311, due out this month.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Martin George https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Martin George2006-10-11 17:52:552006-10-11 17:52:57Significant Reform of Japanese Private International Law
2 replies
  1. delwar says:
    July 15, 2007 at 5:17 am

    please,
    Make available of this articles.
    Thank you

  2. Martin George says:
    July 15, 2007 at 10:50 am

    Delwar,

    Information on subscribing to the Journal of Private International Law can be found here: http://www.hartjournals.co.uk/JPrivIntL/subscriptions.html

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: EU Council Confirms Decision for the Accession of the Community to the Hague Conference on Private International Law, and Common Position on European Small Claims Procedure Link to: EU Council Confirms Decision for the Accession of the Community to the Hague Conference on Private International Law, and Common Position on European Small Claims Procedure EU Council Confirms Decision for the Accession of the Community to the Hague... Link to: EDPS Opinion on Maintenance Obligations Regulation Proposal Link to: EDPS Opinion on Maintenance Obligations Regulation Proposal EDPS Opinion on Maintenance Obligations Regulation Proposal
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top