Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Surrogate motherhood and Spanish homosexual couple (III)

September 20, 2010/in /by Marta Requejo
image_pdfimage_print

You might remember my last post on surrogate pregnancy, where I informed about a 2009 decision of the Spanish Dirección General de los Registros y el Notariado ordering registration of a birth certificate issued in the USA. The document concerned the parenthood of two children born in San Diego to a surrogate mother and a homosexual Spanish couple; the entry listed the couple as father of the twins. The saga goes on: on Friday, the Tribunal de Primera Instancia No. 15 of Valencia, at the request of the Public Prosecutor, declared the entry null.

In its ruling, the judge states that children are the result of a pregnancy by substitution, which is not allowed by Spanish law; and that their filiation has to be determined by birth. In what is quoted as his own words, «La ley española prohíbe expresamente que la filiación en estos casos no se inscriba a favor de la persona que los ha parido».

With regard to the discrimination statement put forward by the lawyer of the couple, the judge  points out that the children can not be registered as hers not because both parents are men, but because they were born to another person: “This legal consequence would equally apply to a homosexual- male and female- couple, man or woman alone, or a heterosexual couple, because the law does not distinguish gender in such cases”. From the Spanish legal point of view, the crucial fact in order to determine filiation is the giving of birth.

As for the argument that registration must be allowed in the best interests of the children, the court admits it is not irrelevant, but states that “the end does not justify the means, and the Spanish legal system has sufficient instruments to achieve consistency”.

The couple has decided to appeal the ruling before the Audiencia Provincial.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Marta Requejo https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Marta Requejo2010-09-20 10:42:182010-09-20 10:42:18Surrogate motherhood and Spanish homosexual couple (III)

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: Kenneth Anderson on Kiovel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Link to: Kenneth Anderson on Kiovel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Kenneth Anderson on Kiovel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Link to: Third Preliminary Draft of the CLIP Principles Link to: Third Preliminary Draft of the CLIP Principles Third Preliminary Draft of the CLIP Principles
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top