Views
Nothing Found
Sorry, no posts matched your criteria
News
Call for Papers: SLS Conflict of Laws Section, Preston 2019
Since Conflict of Laws became a subject section at the Society of Legal Scholars in 2017, it has been part of the Society’s annual conference. This year’s conference, which will be held in Preston, UK, from 3 September to 6 September (right before the Journal of Private International Law Conference in Munich), is no exception and the organiser’s of the Conflict of Laws section, Andrew Dickinson and Máire Ní Shúilleabháin, have kindly provided the following Call for Papers:
SLS Conflict of Laws Section: Call for Papers and Panels for 2019 SLS Annual Conference at the University of Central Lancashire, Preston
This is a call for papers and panels for the Conflict of Laws section of the 2019 SLS Annual Conference to be held at the University of Central Lancashire in Preston from Tuesday 3rd September – Friday 6th September. This year’s theme is ‘Central Questions About Law’.
This marks the third year of the Conflict of Laws section, and we are hoping to build on the successful meetings in Dublin and London.
The Conflict of Laws section will meet in the first half of the conference on Tuesday 3rd and Wednesday 4th September.
We intend that the section will comprise four sessions of 90 minutes, with 3 or more papers being presented in each session, followed by discussion. At least three of the sessions will be organised by theme. We hope, if submissions allow, to be able to set aside one session for papers by early career researchers (within 5-years of PhD or equivalent).
We welcome proposals from scholars in the field for papers or panels on any issue relating to any topical aspect of the Conflict of Laws (private international law), including but not limited to those addressing this year’s conference theme.
If you are interested in delivering a paper, we ask you to submit a proposed title and abstract of around 300 words. If you wish to propose a panel, please submit an outline of the theme and rationale for the panel and the names of the proposed speakers (who must have agreed to participate), together with their proposed titles and abstracts. We welcome proposals representing a full range of intellectual perspectives in the subject section, and from those at all stages of their careers.
Please submit your paper abstract or panel details by 11:59pm UK time on Monday 18th March 2019. All abstracts and panel details must be submitted through the Oxford Abstracts conference system which can be accessed using the following link – https://app.oxfordabstracts.com/stages/1028/submission – and following the instructions (select ‘Track’ for the relevant subject section). If you registered for Oxford Abstracts for last year’s conference, please ensure that you use the same e-mail address this year if that address remains current. If you experience any issues in using Oxford Abstracts, please contact slsconference@mosaicevents.co.uk.
As the SLS is keen to ensure that as many members with good quality papers as possible are able to present, we discourage speakers from presenting more than one paper at the conference. With this in mind, when you submit an abstract via Oxford Abstracts, you will be asked to note if you are also responding to calls for papers or panels from other sections.
The SLS offers a Best Paper Prize which can be awarded to academics at any stage of their career and which is open to those presenting papers individually or within a panel. The Prize carries a £250 monetary award and the winning paper will, subject to the usual process of review and publisher’s conditions, be published in Legal Studies.
To be eligible for the Best Paper Prize:
- speakers must be fully paid-up members of the SLS;
- papers must not exceed 12,000 words including footnotes (as counted in Word);
- papers must be uploaded to the paperbank by 11.59pm UK time on Monday 26th August; and
- papers must not have been published previously or have been accepted or be under consideration for publication.
We have also been asked to remind you that all speakers will need to book and pay to attend the conference and that they will need to register for the conference by Friday 14th June in order to secure their place within the programme, though please do let us know if this is likely to pose any problems for you. Booking information will be circulated in due course.
We note also that prospective speakers do not need to be members of the SLS or already signed up as members of a section to propose or deliver a paper.
We look forward to seeing you, as a speaker or delegate, at the Conflict of Laws session in Lancashire.
With best wishes,
Professor Andrew Dickinson, St Catherine’s College, University of Oxford
Dr Máire Ní Shúilleabháin, University College Dublin (Conveners)
Conference on Corruption and Investment Law
Corruption continues to cast a shadow over investment law. When allegations of corruption arise in an investment dispute, the tribunal faces the difficult task of deciding whether (and how) to penalize the responsible party. It must assess the often-limited evidence and then craft an appropriate remedy. The legal and practical questions this raises remain highly contested. On Tuesday, February 19, 2019, the ILA American Branch Investment Law Committee and the Georgetown International Arbitration Society are hosting an evening conference to discuss these questions, bringing together academic and non-academic perspectives.
Panel 1: What is sufficient proof of corruption?
• Aloysius Llamzon, Senior Associate, King & Spalding
• Jason Yackee, Professor, University of Wisconsin
• Meriam Al-Rashid, Partner, Dentons
Panel 2: What is the right response when corruption is found?
• Lucinda Low, Partner, Steptoe
• Arif H. Ali, Partner, Dechert
Opening and closing:
• David L. Attanasio, Co-Chair, ILA American Branch Investment Law Committee; Associate, Dechert
• Malika Aggarwal, Georgetown International Arbitration Society
Location:
Dechert
1900 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
When:
Tuesday, February 19, 2019, with registration from 4:45 pm and the program commencing at 5:00 pm.
Space is limited, so please RSVP as soon as possible here
The Japanese Yearbook of International Law (Vol. 61, 2018)
The forthcoming volume of the Japanese Yearbook of International Law (Vol. 61, 2018) will feature the following articles and case notes relating to private international law:
Articles
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF CONSUMER COLLECTIVE REDRESS
Dai Yokomizo, Introductory Note (168)
Kazuhiko Yamamoto, Special Proceedings for the Collective Redress for Property Damage Incurred by Consumers — About So-Called “Japanese Class Action” — (169)
Dai Yokomizo, Consumer Collective Redress and Japanese Conflict of Laws (190)
Stefaan Voet, Europe’s Collective Redress Conundrum (205)
Catherine Piché & Geneviève Saumier, Consumer Collective Redress in Canada (231)
PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
Masato Dogauchi, The Aftermath of the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Accident: How Japanese Lawyers Have Been Playing Their Roles with Regard to the Nuclear Damage? (284)
JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN JAPAN (369ss)
Public International Law
Takamatsu High Court, Judgment, April 25, 2016
Hate Speech — The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination — Relevance of the Convention in Interpreting Domestic Laws
Nagoya High Court, Judgment, September 7, 2016
Eligibility for Refugee Status — Burden and Degree of Proof — Situation in Nepal — Article 1 of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees — Handbook and Guidelines on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status
Nagoya High Court, Judgment, November 30, 2016
Factors to be Taken into Consideration in Determination of Special Permission to Stay — Continuous De Facto Marriage and Family Life — Criminal Offence and Extenuating Circumstances
Naha District Court (Okinawa Branch), Judgment, February 9, 2017
State Immunity — Activities of Foreign Armed Forces Stationing in the Forum State with Its Consent — Tort Exception — Relationship Between the United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Customary Rules on State Immunity
Private International Law
Supreme Court (3rd Petty Bench), Judgment, December 12, 2017
Challenge to Arbitral Award — Arbitrator Conflict of Interest — Disclosure of Conflict of Interest
Supreme Court (3rd Petty Bench), Judgment, 12 December 2017
Japanese Anti-Monopoly Act — Extraterritorial Application — Price-Fixing Cartel
Supreme Court (1st Petty Bench), Decision, December 21, 2017
International Child Abduction — Modification of the Order to Return
Tokyo High Court, Judgment, November 25, 2015
Enforcement of Judgment — Defamation — Reciprocity
Tokyo District Court, Judgment, January 17, 2017
International Adjudicatory Jurisdiction over Consumer Contracts — Rescindment of Contracts by Fraud — Overriding Mandatory Provision
Tokyo High Court, Judgment, October 25, 2017
Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses Commercial Contracts — Public Policy — Civil Remedy— International Private Law — Limitation of Party Autonomy by Mandatory Rules — Abuse of Superior Bargaining Position — Article 24 of the Antimonopoly Act — Article 709 of the Civil Code
More information on the Yearbook (former Annual) and the content of its past volumes is available at http://www.ilajapan.org/jyil/.