Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Stephen Pitel

Professor, Western University

Entries by Stephen Pitel

Ducking the Ricochet: The Supreme Court of Canada on Foreign Judgments

November 7, 2021/in Views/by Stephen Pitel

Written by Stephen G.A. Pitel, Western University The court’s decision in HMB Holdings Ltd v Antigua and Barbuda, 2021 SCC 44 (

Enforcement of Foreign Judgments about Forum Land

June 24, 2021/in Views/by Stephen Pitel

By Stephen G.A. Pitel, Western University In common law Canada, it has long been established that a court will not recognize and enforce a foreign judgment concerning title to land in the forum.  The key case in support is Duke v Andler, [1932] SCR 734. The ongoing application of that decision has now been called […]

Canada’s Top Court to Hear Enforcement Dispute

November 14, 2020/1 Comment/in News/by Stephen Pitel

By Stephen G.A. Pitel, Western University The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave in H.M.B. Holdings Limited v Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda.  Information about the appeal is available

Uber Arbitration Clause Unconscionable

June 29, 2020/1 Comment/in Views/by Stephen Pitel

In 2017 drivers working under contract for Uber in Ontario launched a class action.  They alleged that under Ontario law they were employees entitled to various benefits Uber was not providing.  In response, Uber sought to stay the proceedings on the basis of an arbitration clause in the standard-form contract with each driver.  Under its […]

Jurisdiction to Garnish Funds in Foreign Bank Account

May 4, 2020/in Views/by Stephen Pitel

By Stephen G.A. Pitel, Faculty of Law, Western University Instrubel, N.V., a Dutch corporation, has been attempting in litigation in Quebec to garnish assets of the Republic of Iraq.  The difficult issue has been the nature of the assets sought to be garnished and where they are, as a matter of law, located.  The assets […]

Indigenous Claims to Foreign Land: Update from Canada

February 29, 2020/in Views/by Stephen Pitel

By Stephen G.A. Pitel, Faculty of Law, Western University In 2013 two Innu First Nations sued, in the Superior Court of Quebec, two mining companies responsible for a mega-project consisting of multiple open-pit mines near Schefferville, Quebec and Labrador City, Newfoundland and Labrador. The Innu asserted a right to the exclusive use and occupation of […]

Claims Against Corporate Defendant Founded on Customary International Law Can Proceed in Canada

February 28, 2020/in Views/by Stephen Pitel

By Stephen G.A. Pitel, Faculty of Law, Western University Eritrean mine workers who fled from that country to British Columbia sued the mine’s owner, Nevsun Resources Ltd. They sought damages for various torts including battery, false imprisonment and negligence. They also sought damages for breaches of customary international law. Their core allegation was that as […]

Staying Proceedings under the Civil Code of Quebec

October 28, 2019/1 Comment/in Views/by Stephen Pitel

Written by Professor Stephen G.A. Pitel, Western University The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in R.S. v P.R., 2019 SCC 49 (available

What Does it Mean to Submit to a Foreign Forum?

February 28, 2019/in Views/by Stephen Pitel

The meaning of submission was the central question, though by no means the only one, in the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Barer v Knight Brothers LLC, 2019 SCC 13 (available

Ontario Court Holds Law of Bangladesh Applies to Rana Plaza Collapse Claim

December 21, 2018/1 Comment/in News/by Stephen Pitel

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has upheld a decision of the Superior Court of Justice dismissing a $2 billion claim against Loblaws relating to the 2013 collapse of the Rana Plaza building in Savar, Bangladesh.  In Das v George Weston Limited, 2018 ONCA 1053 (available

Page 2 of 12‹1234›»

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top