Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Jan von Hein

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Jan von Hein contributed 271 entries already.

Entries by Jan von Hein

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 4/2023: Abstracts

June 29, 2023/in News/by Jan von Hein

The latest issue of the „Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)“ features the following articles: (These abstracts can also be found at the IPRax-website under the following link: 

No Recognition in Switzerland of the Removal of Gender Information according to German Law

June 9, 2023/in News/by Jan von Hein

This note has been kindly provided by Dr. Samuel Vuattoux-Bock, LL.M. (Kiel), University of Freiburg (Germany). On 8 June 2023, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court (

Regional Developments in International Law in Africa and Latin America – Annual Meeting of the German Branch of the ILA, Frankfurt, 7 July 2023

June 9, 2023/in News/by Jan von Hein

This year’s annual meeting of the

Towards an EU Regulation on the International Protection of Adults

June 5, 2023/in Views/by Jan von Hein

On 31 May 2023, the European Commission presented a

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 2/2023: Abstracts

March 1, 2023/in News/by Jan von Hein

The latest issue of the „Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)“ features the following articles: (These abstracts can also be found at the IPRax-website under the following link: 

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 1/2023: Abstracts

December 19, 2022/in News/by Jan von Hein

The latest issue of the „Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)“ features the following articles: (These abstracts can also be found at the IPRax-website under the following link: 

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 6/2022: Abstracts

October 28, 2022/in News/by Jan von Hein

The latest issue of the „Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)“ features the following articles: (These abstracts can also be found at the IPRax-website under the following link: 

What is an international contract within the meaning of Article 3(3) Rome I? – Dexia Crediop SpA v Provincia di Pesaro e Urbino [2022] EWHC 2410 (Comm)

October 21, 2022/1 Comment/in Views/by Jan von Hein

The following comment has been kindly provided by Sarah Ott, a doctoral student and research assistant at the University of Freiburg (Germany), Institute for Comparative and Private International Law, Dept. III. On 27 September 2022, the English High Court granted summary judgment and declaratory relief in favour of the Italian bank Dexia Crediop SpA (“Dexia“) […]

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 5/2022: Abstracts

September 1, 2022/in News/by Jan von Hein

The latest issue of the „Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)“ features the following articles: (These abstracts can also be found at the IPRax-website under the following link: 

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 4/2022: Abstracts

June 27, 2022/in News/by Jan von Hein

The latest issue of the „Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)“ features the following articles: (These abstracts can also be found at the IPRax-website under the following link: 

Page 3 of 28‹12345›»

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top