Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Giesela Ruehl

Giesela is a Professor of Private International Law at Humboldt-University Berlin (Germany). She has been an editor of conflictoflaws.net since 2011. From 2017 to 2019 she was general editor of the blog.

Entries by Giesela Ruehl

Call for Papers: Judges in Utopia – Civil Courts as European Courts

December 11, 2018/in News/by Giesela Ruehl

We would like to invite young scholars to submit a paper for the upcoming conference entitled ‘Judges in Utopia: Civil Courts as European Courts’, which will take place in Amsterdam on 7 and 8 November 2019. The conference’s aim is to reflect with legal scholars and practitioners on the reconceptualization of the role of civil […]

Vacancy at the University of Bremen: Paid PhD-Researcher Position in Private International Law

November 26, 2018/in News/by Giesela Ruehl

The University of BremenLaw School will recruit a doctoral researcher in Private International Law (‘wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter’ m/w/d), part time 50 per cent, starting in early 2019, for a duration of 36 months. The researcher will work on the project ‘Rome Regulations. Commentary, 3rded. (Calliess/Renner eds.)’. In addition, there is a teaching obligation of 2 hours/week, 28 weeks/year […]

Blockchain Networks and European Private International Law

November 26, 2018/2 Comments/in Views/by Giesela Ruehl

Written by Anton S. Zimmermann, Institute for Comparative Law, Conflict of Laws and International Business Law (Heidelberg) Blockchain technology and its offspring have recently attracted considerable attention in both media and scholarship. Its decentralised nature raises several legal questions. Among these are, for example, the challenges that blockchain technology poses to data protection laws and […]

4/5 December: Dispute resolution events at University of Antwerp

November 20, 2018/in News/by Giesela Ruehl

On 4 and 5 December 2018 the following two events will take place at the University of Antwerp: On 4 December 2018,

Out now: Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht, Issue 4 (2018)

November 12, 2018/in News/by Giesela Ruehl

The latest issue of the

Out now: Journal of Private International Law, Volume 14, Issue 3

November 8, 2018/in News/by Giesela Ruehl

Issue 14. 3 of the Journal of Private International Law has just been released. It contains the following articles: Maria Caterina Baruffi, 

Out now: Issue 4 of RabelsZ 82 (2018)

November 5, 2018/in News/by Giesela Ruehl

The new issue of “Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht – The Rabels Journal of Comparative and International Private Law” (RabelsZ) is now available. It contains the following articles (summaries provided for non-English language) : Mathias Reimann,European Advantages in Global Lawyering, pp. 885-921 Jürgen Basedow, The Hague Conference and the Future of Private International […]

Netherlands Commercial Court: English proceedings in The Netherlands

October 25, 2018/in Views/by Giesela Ruehl

By Friederike Henke, Advocaat & Rechtsanwältin at Buren in Amsterdam The international demand for English language dispute resolution is increasing as the English language is commonly used in international trade and contracts as well as correspondence, not only between the trading partners themselves, but also by international parties, their legal departments and their advisors. Use of […]

Alexander Vik v Deutsche Bank AG: the powers of the English court outside of the jurisdiction in contempt of court proceedings

October 23, 2018/in Views/by Giesela Ruehl

By Diana Kostina The recent Court of Appeal judgment in

Call for Papers: Cynical International Law?

October 9, 2018/in News/by Giesela Ruehl

The Working Group of Young Scholars in Public International Law and the German Society of International Law are pleased to invite the submission of papers for a conference on Cynical International Law? Abuse and Circumvention in Public and Private International Law as well as European Law 6 – 7 September 2019, Freie Universität Berlin. Contributions […]

Page 16 of 43«‹1415161718›»

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top