Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Ekaterina Pannebakker

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Ekaterina Pannebakker contributed 29 entries already.

Entries by Ekaterina Pannebakker

The Dutch Supreme Court on how to deal with the CISG on appeal (Willemen Infra v Jura)

February 28, 2023/in Views/by Ekaterina Pannebakker

On 24 February 2023, the Dutch Supreme court has ruled in the case

CJEU ruling in FNV v. Van Den Bosch: follow-up in Dutch courts

October 18, 2022/in Views/by Ekaterina Pannebakker

As previously reported on

‘Force majeure certificates’ issued by the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry

April 17, 2020/in Views/by Ekaterina Pannebakker

The Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry is issuing ‘force majeure certificates’, like some of their homologues in other countries, as discussed

Two post-doc positions at the University of Maastricht

April 10, 2019/in News/by Ekaterina Pannebakker

Kindly shared by

In 2018, the Dutch Supreme Court found a Spanish judgment applicable in the Netherlands, based on the Hague Convention on the International Protection of Adults. Minor detail: neither the Netherlands nor Spain is a party to this Convention.

February 20, 2019/in Views/by Ekaterina Pannebakker

Written by Dr. Anneloes Kuiper, Assistant Professor at Utrecht University, the Netherlands In 2018, the Dutch Supreme Court found a Spanish judgment applicable in the Netherlands, based on the Hague Convention on the International Protection of Adults. Minor detail: neither the Netherlands nor Spain is a party to this Convention. Applicant in this case filed […]

New UNCITRAL documents on mediation and on recognition and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments

September 21, 2018/in News/by Ekaterina Pannebakker

The UNCITRAL has published the

The Russian Supreme Court’s guidelines on private international law

August 14, 2018/in Views/by Ekaterina Pannebakker

The Russian Supreme Court has published the

The concept of ‘right of access’ under Brussels II bis encompasses grandparents

July 2, 2018/in Views/by Ekaterina Pannebakker

In the judgment C-335/17 of 31 May 2018, the CJEU confirms that the autonomous concept of ‘right of access’ under Brussels II bis Regulation encompasses the rights of access of grandparents to their grandchildren.

The CJEU on the scope of the Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims.

January 22, 2018/in News/by Ekaterina Pannebakker

On 14 December 2017  the CJEU has ruled on the scope of the Regulation (EC) No 805/2004  European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims –

Page 3 of 3123

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top