Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

French Tax Authorities Recognize Dutch Same-Sex Marriage

September 8, 2008/2 Comments/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

Vivre d'amour et d'eau fraiche ?Le Monde has reported this week that the French Ministry of Finance has accepted to recognize a Dutch same-sex marriage for tax purposes.

According to the article, the two Dutch men had married in Leyden in 2002. They then moved to France, probably in 2004. In 2005, they tried to file a tax return in common, which can attract significant tax benefits. First, French tax authorities refused, arguing that same-sex marriage does not exist in France.

The spouses hired a lawyer who challenged the decision on their behalf. Le Monde reports that he insisted “international conventions signed by France and rules of international private law” should be applied. In July 2008, the Legal Department of the Ministry of Finance eventually notified the spouses that they would be considered so for French tax purposes.

Same sex union was introduced in France in 1999 (“PACS”). It has some tax consequences. Here, the parties never tried to argue, it seems, that the Dutch marriage could be recognized as a French PACS.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2008-09-08 06:31:282008-09-08 06:31:28French Tax Authorities Recognize Dutch Same-Sex Marriage
2 replies
  1. Michelle S de Bruin says:
    September 9, 2008 at 9:25 pm

    This has interesting implications for Ireland.
    A recent Irish case (Zappone and Gilligan v Revenue Commissioners & Ors) concerned two women who had married one another in a ceremony in Canada. They were, however, Irish citizens and were also resident in Ireland when they brought proceedings against the Revenue Commissioners claiming allowances as a married couple under the Taxes Consolidation Acts. In the High Court, Dunne J. rejected the Plaintiffs’ claim for recognition of their Canadian marriage and also their challenge to the relevant provisions of the Tax Code. A second case has since been brought seeking recognition of the Canadian marriage. No decision had been handed down yet.
    Same sex unions are not yet recognised in Ireland, although legislation permitting a form of civil union is forthcoming.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: The AG Opinion in West Tankers Link to: The AG Opinion in West Tankers The AG Opinion in West Tankers Link to: Guest Editorial: Hay on Recognition of a Recognition Judgment under Brussels I? Link to: Guest Editorial: Hay on Recognition of a Recognition Judgment under Brussels I? Guest Editorial: Hay on Recognition of a Recognition Judgment under Brussels...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top