Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Conference on the Brussels I Review Proposal

January 20, 2011/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

The British Institute of International and Comparative Law will hold a conference on the Commission’s Brussels I Review Proposal of December 2010 on February 10th, 2011.

Speakers will include:

The Right Hon the Lord Mance, Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
Professor Alegría Borras, University of Barcelona, Spain; GEDIP
Andrew Dickinson, Professor in Private International Law, University of Sydney; Consultant, Clifford Chance LLP; Visiting Fellow at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law
Dr Pippa Rogerson, University of Cambridge
Professor Jonathan Harris, University of Birmingham; Serle Court, London
Professor Michael Bogdan, University of Lund, Sweden
Professor Andreas Furrer, University of Luzern, Switzerland
Alexander Layton QC, 20 Essex Street
Professor em Ulrich Magnus, University of Hamburg, Germany
Professor Luboš Tichý, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic


More details can be found here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2011-01-20 14:23:312011-01-20 14:23:31Conference on the Brussels I Review Proposal

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: OUP Yearbooks Available Online Link to: OUP Yearbooks Available Online OUP Yearbooks Available Online Link to: Publication: Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades Link to: Publication: Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades Publication: Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top