Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Conflict of Law Symposium

October 24, 2007/in /by Veronika Gaertner
image_pdfimage_print

The Tulane Law Review and the Duke Center for International and Comparative Law organise a symposium entitled:

The European Choice-of-Law Revolution — A Chance for the United States?

Confirmed participants for this symposium include:

  • Bernard Audit (Paris I), Richard Fentiman (Cambridge), and Ralf Michaels (Duke) discussing methods
  • Stephanie Francq (Louvain-la-Neuve), Mathias Reimann (Michigan), and Larry Ribstein (Illinois) discussing federal unification and the dichotomy of internal and external conflicts
  • Horatia Muir-Watt (Paris I) and Jurgen Basedow (Max Planck) discussing interstate market regulation
  • Jens Dammann (Texas) and Onnig Dombalagian (Tulane) discussing conflicts in corporate law
  • Jan von Hein (Max Planck) and Symeon Symeonides (Willamette) discussing conflicts in tort law
  • Dennis Solomon (Tubingen), Bill Richman (Toledo), and Patrick Borchers (Creighton) discussing conflicts in contract law

The symposium will take place on 9 February 2008 in Durham, NC

More information can be found at the website of the Tulane Law Review.

(Thanks to Prof. Jan von Hein (Trier) for the tip-off.)

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Veronika Gaertner https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Veronika Gaertner2007-10-24 05:33:582007-10-24 10:52:55Conflict of Law Symposium

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Political Immobilisation of Iranian Diaspora Property: Lex Situs, Human Rights and Public Policy August 22, 2026
  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
Link to: Studies on Brussels I Regulation – National Reports available Link to: Studies on Brussels I Regulation – National Reports available Studies on Brussels I Regulation – National Reports available Link to: German Article on Abusive Choice of Court Clauses in European Law Link to: German Article on Abusive Choice of Court Clauses in European Law German Article on Abusive Choice of Court Clauses in European Law
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top