Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Proskauer on International Litigation and Arbitration: A Review

October 10, 2007/in /by Charles Kotuby
image_pdfimage_print

Proskauer Rose LLP has just announced the release of its new E-Guide: “Proskauer on International Litigation and Arbitration: Managing, Resolving and Avoiding Cross-Border Business and Regulatory Disputes.” It is a welcome compendium of information for all sorts of practitioners – both litigation-centered and transactional – and brings together a wide array of topics under the common heading of cross-border legal issues.

To cover these issues, the E-Guide is divided into three sections dedicated to “International Litigation,” “International Arbitration,” and “International Issues in Select Substantive Areas.” The litigation section is broad and comprehensive, tackling matters that arise at the outset of a suit (e.g., securing U.S jurisdiction, venue and service outside the U.S.), and during the prosecution of a suit (e.g., choice of law, discovery, and trial), but also issues that are not commonly discussed in the traditional model if private international law texts. The chapters on government investigations and government immunity, U.S. abstention doctrine, the role of comity in U.S. courts, and anti-suit injunctions are particularly helpful to the practitioner aiming, in the authors’ words, to “present clients with strategic choices.” Later chapters on litigation ancillary to arbitration, and fighting to compel or avoid arbitration, have a similar practical focus.

The text of the E-guide is presented simply and and effectively, grazing the surface to focus more detailed research when necessary, and providing necessary details itself when appropriate. The authors believe that Proskauer on International Litigation and Arbitration is a “useful tool in . . . efforts to confront, resolve, and even avoid the issues that arise when a commercial or regulatory dispute jumps – or should jump – national borders.” A useful tool it certainly is.

It is available in its entirety here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Charles Kotuby https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Charles Kotuby2007-10-10 15:36:282007-10-10 15:36:28Proskauer on International Litigation and Arbitration: A Review

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
Link to: General Motors Corp v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Group Link to: General Motors Corp v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Group General Motors Corp v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Group Link to: Third Issue of 2007’s Journal du Droit International Link to: Third Issue of 2007’s Journal du Droit International Third Issue of 2007’s Journal du Droit International
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top