Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

ERA Conference on Stockholm Programme

October 18, 2009/in /by Veronika Gaertner
image_pdfimage_print

The Academy of European Law (ERA) will host another interesting conference titled

New Horizons for Civil Justice in Europe: Towards the “Stockholm Programme”

The conference will discuss the key issues for the Stockholm Programme in terms of cooperation in civil matters as presented in the Commission communication COM (2009) 262 of 10 June 2009, such as

  • mutual recognition
  • abolishment of exequatur
  • speeding up cross-border debt recovery
  • an optional European contract law (a ‘twenty-eighth’ system)
  • e-justice

The conference will take place in Trier (Germany) from 5th – 6th November 2009.

More information on fees and registration can be found at the ERA website.

Update: The conference is programme is now available and can be found here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Veronika Gaertner https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Veronika Gaertner2009-10-18 05:10:062009-10-18 09:05:38ERA Conference on Stockholm Programme

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: Latest Issue of “Rabels Zeitschrift” Link to: Latest Issue of “Rabels Zeitschrift” Latest Issue of “Rabels Zeitschrift” Link to: French Court Agrees with U.S. Anti-suit Injunction Link to: French Court Agrees with U.S. Anti-suit Injunction French Court Agrees with U.S. Anti-suit Injunction
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top