Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Second Issue of 2009’s Revue Critique de Droit International Privé

August 25, 2009/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

Revue Critique DIPThe second issue of the Revue Critique de Droit International Privé was released earlier this month.

It contains three articles, but only two deal with conflict issues.

The first is authored by Tunisian professor Sami Bostanji. It addresses the Survival of Communitarism in Judicial Application of Tunisian Private International Law (La survivance du communautarisme dans l’application judiciaire du droit international privé tunisien). Here is the English abstract:

Despite the efforts afforded by codification to modernise and rationalise private international law in Tunisia, later case-law bears witness to the survival of communitarism, through a practice inspired by the idea that each individual “belongs” to a differentiated community. This approach favors discontinuity between different legal orders to the detriment of individual rights, and disregards the important objective of coordinating legal systems. It looks much like traditional religious communitarism, for instance in the treatment of relationships between spouses or between parents and children (adoption, custody, etc…), But it also takes on the form of nationalistic communitarism, which ignores or even violates the codified rules of private international law.

  The second article is authored by Carlos Alberto Arrue-Montenegro, a scholar from Panama, and discusses the economic rationale of a recent Panama statute as far as choice of court agreements in admiralty matters are concerned (Les orientations économiques du droit maritime international de Panama en matière d’accord de juridiction. A propos de la loi n°12 du 23 janvier 2009 modifiant la loi panaméenne procédure maritime). Unfortunately, no abstract is provided.

Articles of the Revue Critique cannot be downloaded.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2009-08-25 08:54:052009-08-25 08:54:05Second Issue of 2009’s Revue Critique de Droit International Privé

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: Chinese Judgment Enforced in the United States Link to: Chinese Judgment Enforced in the United States Chinese Judgment Enforced in the United States Link to: Opinion of the Comittee of the Regions on Consumer Rights: quite a critical view on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on consumer rights Link to: Opinion of the Comittee of the Regions on Consumer Rights: quite a critical view on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on consumer rights Opinion of the Comittee of the Regions on Consumer Rights: quite a critical...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top