Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

New Service Regulation No 1393/2007 and Denmark (Update)

November 17, 2008/in /by Giorgio Buono
image_pdfimage_print

Following our recent post on the application of Reg. No 1393/2007 since 13 November 2008, and the issue of the participation of Denmark, we would like to point out an item published on the newsletter of the Danish Ministry of Justice (No 119 of 21 December 2007). The newsletter refers to an Administrative Order (Bekendtgørelse) issued by the Danish Minister for Justice, on the implementation of changes to the provisions of Reg. No 1348/2000 (that were already applicable in Denmark by virtue of the “parallel” agreement with the EC), starting from 13 November 2008.

Here’s an automatic translation (by Google Translate, not further revised) from Danish:

Order No. 1476 of 12 December 2007 implementing changes to the Service Regulation

The notice is published in the Government Gazette on 21 December 2007 and will enter into force on 30 December 2007. The Order shall not apply to service, conducted on 13 November 2008 or later.

The notice states that the codified Regulation No 1393/2007 on the service of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil and commercial matters applies in this country. The consolidated Service Regulation comes into force on 30 December 2007 but must first apply from 13 November 2008. The notice also contains a number of detailed provisions similar to some of the provisions of the current Order No. 423 of 8 May 2007 on certain issues concerning the implementation of a parallel agreement on the service regulation, which lifted from 13 November 2008.

The Administrative Order can be found here (in Danish). Here’s an automatic translation (by Google Translate, not further revised) of its Articles 1 and 6 (on the entry into force and application):

Order on the implementation of changes to the Service Regulation

[…]

§ 1 – 1.The provisions of the European Parliament and Council Regulation No. 1393/2007 on the service of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil and commercial matters and repealing Council Regulation No. 1348/2000 applies in this country.

2. Regulation reference to “Member States” also includes Denmark.

[…]

§ 6 – 1. These Regulations shall come into force on 30 December 2007 and applies to service carried out on 13 November 2008 or later.

2. Decree No. 423 of 8 May 2007 on certain issues concerning the implementation of a parallel agreement on the service be abolished, 13 November 2008.

Even from this very rough translation, it seems that Denmark has implemented administratively the provisions of the new Service Regulation, setting for its implementing measures the same dates of entry into force (30 December 2007) and application (13 November 2008) as those provided for by Art. 26 of Reg. No 1393/2007. This condition is required by Art. 3(4) of the “parallel” agreement (text) between the EC and Denmark on Reg. No 1348/2000, which reads as follows:

4. If the notification indicates that implementation can take place administratively the notification shall, moreover, state that all necessary administrative measures enter into force on the date of entry into force of the amendments to the Regulation or have entered into force on the date of the notification, whichever date is the latest.

The same condition was recalled in the document available on the European Judicial Atlas in Civil Matters that we mentioned in our previous post:

In accordance with Article 3(4) of the Agreement, the necessary administrative measures will take effect on the date of entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007.

So, while the situation would appear quite clear on the Danish side (Denmark having fulfilled its obligations under the “parallel” agreement), there are still uncertainties on the EC side, at least from the information currently available to the public.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giorgio Buono https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giorgio Buono2008-11-17 17:52:192008-11-17 18:00:47New Service Regulation No 1393/2007 and Denmark (Update)

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
Link to: Rome I: Commission’s Opinion on the Opting-In by the UK Link to: Rome I: Commission’s Opinion on the Opting-In by the UK Rome I: Commission’s Opinion on the Opting-In by the UK Link to: Assistant in Private International Law in Luxembourg Link to: Assistant in Private International Law in Luxembourg Assistant in Private International Law in Luxembourg
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top