Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Volume on the Role of Consumer ADR and the Administration of Justice

December 22, 2014/in /by Giesela Ruehl
image_pdfimage_print

Michael Stürner (University of Konstanz), Fernando Gascón Inchausti (Complutense University of Madrid) and Remo Caponi (University of Florence) have edited a volume on “The Role of Consumer ADR in the Administration of Justice” (Sellier European Law Publishers, Munich). It sheds light on the Directive on Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Regulation on Online Dispute Resolution – and their likely impact on the administration of justice in consumer matters:

The book jacket reads as follows:

The landscape of alternative dispute resolution in consumer cases (CADR)
is about to change profoundly. With the advent of Directive 2013/11/EU on
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 on
Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) a new way to settle disputes is advocated
as a tool to enhance the internal market. The ADR system implemented by
these instruments is designed to provide for speedy and low-cost out-ofcourt
dispute settlement procedures between consumers and traders arising
from the sales of goods and services. However, many questions remain open,
namely the impact of the CADR system on the adjudication by state courts.
The role CADR can play in the administration of justice is yet to be defined. In
the present volume renowned experts of civil procedure and ADR shed light
on a newly emerging branch of law.

More information is available on the publisher’s website.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giesela Ruehl https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giesela Ruehl2014-12-22 06:00:492014-12-19 22:33:23Volume on the Role of Consumer ADR and the Administration of Justice

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: Australian Private International Law for the 21st Century (Hart, 2014) Link to: Australian Private International Law for the 21st Century (Hart, 2014) Australian Private International Law for the 21st Century (Hart, 2014) Link to: Briggs, Private International Law in English Courts (OUP, 2014) Link to: Briggs, Private International Law in English Courts (OUP, 2014) Briggs, Private International Law in English Courts (OUP, 2014)
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top