Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Minne on Choice of Law Rules for Set-Off in the Financial Sector

August 23, 2012/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

Gregory Minne, who is a senior associate at Arendt & Medernach in Luxembourg, has posted Les Règles de Conflit de Lois en Matière de Compensation Dans le Secteur Financier (The Conflict-of-Law Rules Concerning Set-Off in the Financial Sector) on SSRN. The abstract reads:

La présente étude propose de revenir sur les règles de conflits susceptibles d’être rencontrées lorsque le mécanisme de la compensation opère. La perspective luxembourgeoise ainsi que les pratiques de la place apportent un éclairage intéressant à cette problématique.

The objective of this study is to reconsider the rules relating to conflicts likely to be encountered during the operation of the mechanism of set-off. The Luxembourg perspective as well as the practices of the financial centre shed an interesting light on this issue.

The paper was published in the Bulletin Banque et Droit last year.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2012-08-23 05:37:262012-08-23 06:38:01Minne on Choice of Law Rules for Set-Off in the Financial Sector

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: French Code of Private International Law Link to: French Code of Private International Law French Code of Private International Law Link to: Latest Issue of RabelsZ: Vol. 76, No. 3 (2012) Link to: Latest Issue of RabelsZ: Vol. 76, No. 3 (2012) Latest Issue of RabelsZ: Vol. 76, No. 3 (2012)
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top