Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

English-language Commentary on the Rome I and II Regulations

July 4, 2012/in /by Giesela Ruehl
image_pdfimage_print

It has not yet been mentioned on this blog that there is a new English-language commentary on the Rome I and II Regulations out there. Edited by Gralf-Peter Calliess from the University of Bremen and published by Kluwer Law International, the commentary provides an in-depth analysis of the new European conflict rules on contractual and non-contractual obligations. More information is available on the publisher’s website.

The official announcement reads as follows:

The year 2009 marks a revolution in European conflict of laws. The so-called Rome I and II Regulations, both entering into force this year, will bind the Member States of the European Union to a common set of rules for the choice of law in international private law disputes. They apply to both contractual and non-contractual disputes, their reach even extends to the application of non-Member State law. This poses great challenges to Courts and practitioners in every EU Member State, as there is only little case-law and doctrinal literature on the new rules, the uniform application of which will be overseen by the European Court of Justice. The Commentary answers to these challenges. It is an indispensable companion for both academics and legal professionals seeking their way through the Regulations. Renowned conflict of laws scholars comment every provision of the Regulations in a systematic, thorough and comprehensive manner, making them accessible to a broad international legal audience.

Mirroring the German tradition of scholarly commentaries on Parliamentary Acts, the authors are selected from the distinguished group of relatively young German private international law scholars, whose exceptionally high qualifications are represented by their passing through the German “Habilitation“-system (second book requirement) as well as their proven ability to publish in the English language .

The list of authors reads as follows:

  • Professor Dr. Dietmar Baetge, University of Hamburg
  • Assistant Professor Dr. Frank Bauer, University of Munich
  • Professor Dr. Benedikt Buchner, LL.M. (UCLA), University of Bremen
  • Professor Dr. Martin Franzen, University of Munich
  • Professor Dr. Martin Gebauer, University of Heidelberg
  • Professor Dr. Urs Peter Gruber, University of Halle
  • Professor Dr. Axel Halfmeier, Frankfurt School of Finance
  • Professor Dr. Jan von Hein, University of Trier
  • Professor Dr. Lars Klöhn, LL.M. (Harvard), University of Marburg
  • Assistant Professor Dr. Leander D. Loacker, University of Zurich
  • Research Associate Moritz Renner, University of Bremen
  • Assistant Professor Dr. Florian Roedl, University of Bremen
  • Professor Dr. Boris Schinkels, LL.M. (Cambridge), University of Greifswald
  • Professor Dr. Goetz Schulze, University of Lausanne
  • Professor Dr. Matthias Weller, Mag. rer. publ., EBS Law School Wiesbaden
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giesela Ruehl https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giesela Ruehl2012-07-04 15:49:012012-07-05 12:30:33English-language Commentary on the Rome I and II Regulations

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: Book: Pocar – Viarengo – Villata (Eds.), Recasting Brussels I Link to: Book: Pocar – Viarengo – Villata (Eds.), Recasting Brussels I Book: Pocar – Viarengo – Villata (Eds.), Recasting Brussels I Link to: Liber Amicorum Patrick Courbe Link to: Liber Amicorum Patrick Courbe Liber Amicorum Patrick Courbe
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top