Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Max Planck Post-Doc Conference on European Private Law

April 9, 2012/in /by Giesela Ruehl
image_pdfimage_print

On 7 and 8 May 2012 the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law Hamburg hosts the forth Max Planck Post-Doc Conference on European Private Law. It invites European Junior Scholars to present and discuss their research work.

Further information is available here. The programme reads as follows:

MONDAY, 7 MAY 2012

  • 8.30   Accreditation
  • 8.50   Opening Statement, Reinhard Zimmermann
  • 9.00   Error communis facit ius. Application and Distortion of a Roman Law Principle in Western and Eastern European Private Law Codifications, Péter Bónis
  • 9.30    Unwinding of Failed Contracts, Joke Baeck
  • 10.00  Discussion
  • 10.45   Coffee Break
  • 11.00   Roman Law in Comparative Perspective: Acquisitive Prescription, Jelle Erik Jansen
  • 11.30   Functionalism in Personal Property Security, Hano Ernst
  • 12.00  Discussion
  • 12.45   Lunch
  • 14.00  Estonia – a Test-Country for Common European Sales Law, Karin Sein
  • 14.30   Discussion
  • 14.55   New Developments as to Internet Related Infringements – Interest Analysis within the Frames of the Brussels I Regulation, Ulf Maunsbach
  • 15.25   Discussion
  • 15.50   Coffee Break
  • 16.05   Law Applicable to Cross Border Defamation, Justyna Balcarczyk
  • 16.35   The Country of Origin Principle after eDate Advertising, Jan-Jaap Kuipers
  • 17.05   Discussion
  • 19.00   Dinner at the Max Planck Institute
  • 20.30   Closing Discussion

TUESDAY, 8 MAY 2012

  • 9.00    Private International Law and Federalism. A Comparative Perspective (EU / US), Jeremy Heymann
  • 9.30    Party Autonomy in the Field of Non-Contractual Liability Covered by Motor Vehicle Compulsory Insurance,Georgina Garriga
  • 10.00  Discussion
  • 10.45   Coffee Break
  • 11.00   Exitprocedures for Minority Shareholders in Private Companies, Claartje Bulten
  • 11.30   Is Corporate Law a Catalyst for Hedge Fund Activism? A Cross-Border Empirical Analysis, Dionysia Katelouzou
  • 12.00   Discussion
  • 12.45    Lunch
  • 14.00   The Duty of Loyalty and the Corporate Opportunity Doctrine, Corrado Malberti
  • 14.30    Risk and Regulation of Share Ownership: Different Kinds of Shares and Control-Enhancing Mechanisms (CEMs), Veikko Vahtera
  • 15.00   Discussion
  • 15.45    Coffee Break
  • 16.00   Enforcement of Stock Exchange Rules: Highlightening the Interplay between Civil Law, Administrative Law and Penal Law, Nina Reiser
  • 16.30    Discussion
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giesela Ruehl https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giesela Ruehl2012-04-09 19:06:342012-04-09 19:06:34Max Planck Post-Doc Conference on European Private Law

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: Brussels Conference on Cross Border Class Actions Link to: Brussels Conference on Cross Border Class Actions Brussels Conference on Cross Border Class Actions Link to: Desautels-Stein on Race as a Legal Concept Link to: Desautels-Stein on Race as a Legal Concept Desautels-Stein on Race as a Legal Concept
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top