Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Bayreuth Conference on a “Rome 0-Regulation”

March 27, 2012/in /by Giesela Ruehl
image_pdfimage_print

On 29 and 30 June 2012 Stefan Leible and Hannes Unberath from the University of Bayreuth will host a conference on the  question whether we need a “Rome 0-Regulation” dealing with general issues of European Private International Law. Registration is online.

The programme reads as follows:

FREITAG, 29. Juni 2012 (FRIDAY, 29 June 2012)

  • 9:00   Begrüßung und Einführung, Prof. Dr. Stefan Leible, Vicepresident of the University of Bayreuth and Prof. Dr. Hannes Unberath, M. Jur., University of Bayreuth
  • 9:15    Kodifikation und Allgemeiner Teil im IPR, Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Erik Jayme, University of Heidelberg
  • 9:45    Das rechtspolitische Umfeld für eine Rom 0-Verordnung , MR Dr. Rolf Wagner, Federal Ministery of Justice, Berlin
  • 10:15   Allgemeiner Teil und Effizienz , Prof. Dr. Giesela Rühl, LL.M. (Berkeley), University of Jena
  • 10:45  Diskussion
  • 11:15   Kaffeepause
  • 11:45   Qualifikation, Prof. Dr. Helmut Heiss, LL.M. (Chicago), University of Zurich
  • 12:15   Vorfrage, Prof. Dr. Gerald Mäsch, University of Münster
  • 12:45   Diskussion
  • 13:15   Mittagspause
  • 14:30  Engste Verbindung, Prof. Dr. Oliver Remien, University of Würzburg
  • 15:00  Parteiautonomie , Prof. Dr. Heinz-Peter Mansel, University of Cologne
  • 15:30  Diskussion
  • 16:00  Kaffeepause
  • 16:30  Gewöhnlicher Aufenthalt, Prof. Dr. Peter Mankowski, University of Hamburg
  • 17:00  Stellvertretung, Prof. Dr. Martin Gebauer, University of Tübingen
  • 17:30  Diskussion
  • 18:00  Ende des ersten Veranstaltungstages
  • 20:00  Abendessen

SAMSTAG, 30. Juni 2012 (SATURDAY, 30th June 2012)

  • 9:00    Renvoi, Prof. Dr. Jan von Hein, University of Trier
  • 9:30    Interlokale und interpersonale Anknüpfungen, Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hau, University of Passau
  • 10:00 Diskussion
  • 10:30  Kaffeepause
  • 11:00  Eingriffsnormen, Prof. Dr. Dres. h.c. Hans Jürgen Sonnenberger,  University of Munich
  • 11:30  Ordre Public, Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Wurmnest, University of Hannover
  • 12:00  Diskussion
  • 12:30  Mittagspause
  • 13:30  Ermittlung und Anwendung ausländischen Rechts, Prof. Dr. Eva-Maria Kieninger, University of Würzburg
  • 14:00  Alles obsolet? – Anerkennungsprinzip vs. klassisches IPR, Priv.-Doz. Dr. Michael Grünberger, LL.M. (NYU), University of Cologne/University of Bayreuth
  • 14:30  Diskussion
  • 15:00  Ende der Veranstaltung

More information (in German) is available here and here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giesela Ruehl https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giesela Ruehl2012-03-27 12:31:382012-03-27 12:31:38Bayreuth Conference on a “Rome 0-Regulation”

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: ERA Conference on Rome I and II Link to: ERA Conference on Rome I and II ERA Conference on Rome I and II Link to: Saumier on Forum Non Conveniens in Quebec Link to: Saumier on Forum Non Conveniens in Quebec Saumier on Forum Non Conveniens in Quebec
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top