Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

ERA Conference on the Optional European Sales Law

January 10, 2012/in /by Giesela Ruehl
image_pdfimage_print

On 9 and 10 February 2012, the European Law Academy will host a conference on the Optional European Sales Law in Trier, Germany. The objective of the conference is to discuss the Proposal for a Common European Sales Law, which was published by the EU Commission in October 2011. Registration and further information can be found on the ERA website. The programm reads as follows:

Thursday, 9 February 2012

08:30 Arrival and registration
09:00 Welcome, Angelika Fuchs
Chair: Hugh Beale

I. SETTING THE SCENE

09:05 The ongoing political debate
• European Parliament: Diana WallisPolish
• EU Presidency: Aneta Wiewiórowska
• Danish EU Presidency: Morten Fogt

09:45 Discussion

II. LEGAL CHALLENGES FOR THE CESL

10:00 Legal basis, content and scope
Christiane Wendehorst

10:20 CESL and the conflict of laws
Gilles Cuniberti

• CESL and Rome I
• How to fill the gaps? Set-off, assignment, representation and other issues

10:45 Discussion
11:00 Coffee break

Chair: Diana Wallis

III. CESL RULES FOR B2C SALES CONTRACTS

11:30 Pre-contractual information
Eric Clive
• Distance / off-premises contracts
• Contents and sanctions

11:50 Making a binding contract
Anna Veneziano
• Offer and acceptance
• Defects in consent
• Right of withdrawal

12:15 Discussion

12:30 Unfair contract terms: assessing unfairness
Friedrich Graf von Westphalen

12:50 Discussion
13:00 Lunch

Chair: Friedrich Graf von Westphalen

14:00 Obligations and remedies of the parties
Hugh Beale
• Consumer choices
• Requirements
• Prescription periods

14:25 Discussion

14:40 Goods, supply of digital content and pprovision of related services
Matthias Storme

15:00 Discussion

IV. WORKSHOP (with coffee & tea)

15:15 Life-cycle of a contract: a case study on the CESL in legal practice
Martin Schmidt-Kessel

17:00 End of the first conference day
19:00 Evening programme and dinner

Friday, 10 February 2012

Chair: Anna Veneziano

V. CONSUMER AND COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS

09:00 Comparing B2C and B2B contracts, Dora Szentpaly-Kleis
Ursula Pachl
• Which rules are different
• Why?

09:40 What is required to make the optional instrument work in practice?
Dirk Staudenmayer

10:00 Discussion
10:30 Coffee break

Chair: Morten Midtgaard Fogt

VI. PANEL DISCUSSION

11:00
B2C: Added value for consumers or cost
driver for enterprises?
Hanne Melin
Bob Schmitz

B2B: What does the CESL offer to businesses?
Tina Sommer

Andreas Dietzel

13:00 Lunch and end of the conference

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giesela Ruehl https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giesela Ruehl2012-01-10 08:03:512012-01-10 08:03:51ERA Conference on the Optional European Sales Law

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Political Immobilisation of Iranian Diaspora Property: Lex Situs, Human Rights and Public Policy August 22, 2026
  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
Link to: Buxbaum and Michaels on International Antitrust Law Link to: Buxbaum and Michaels on International Antitrust Law Buxbaum and Michaels on International Antitrust Law Link to: Symeonides on Choice of Law in American Courts in 2011 Link to: Symeonides on Choice of Law in American Courts in 2011 Symeonides on Choice of Law in American Courts in 2011
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top