Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Perspectives Contentieuses Internationales (PCI), Volume 4

January 7, 2026/in News/by Tobias Lutzi
image_pdfimage_print

by Fabienne Jault-Seseke

Volume 4 of the Revue Perspectives Contentieuses Internationales (PCI) has been published. Available in open access here.

logo PCI

It includes a special feature on ‘the International Commercial Chamber of the Paris Court of Appeal’ edited by Sandrine Clavel and Daniel Barlow. This feature provides an insight into the history of the chamber, its specific characteristics, its place in the European market for justice, and how it operates. It also includes a presentation of its case law in private international law by Marie-Elodie Ancel and François Mailhé. Case law in arbitration is the subject of three articles by Malik Laazouzi.

Here is the table of the contents of the « dossier »:

  • La chambre commerciale internationale de la Cour d’appel de Paris, juridiction-modèle ? by Sandrine Clavel. Is the International Commercial Chamber of the Paris Court of Appeal a model jurisdiction?
  • La place de la chambre commerciale internationale dans le paysage judiciaire national, by François Ancel (The place of the International Commercial Chamber in the national judicial landscape)
  • La place de la chambre commerciale internationale dans le paysage judiciaire international, par Gilles Cuniberti (The place of the International Commercial Chamber in the international judicial landscape)
  • Procédure et pratiques de la chambre commerciale internationale, par Daniel Barlow (Procedure and practices of the International Commercial Chamber)
  • La jurisprudence de la chambre commerciale internationale en droit international privé, par Marie-Elodie Ancel et François Mailhé (The case law of the International Commercial Chamber in PIL)
  • La jurisprudence de la chambre commerciale internationale en matière d’arbitrage international : l’articulation entre le contentieux arbitral et le contentieux étatique, par Malik Laazouzi (The relationship between arbitration and state litigation in the case law of the International Commercial Chamber)
  • La jurisprudence de la chambre commerciale internationale en matière d’arbitrage international : le respect de la volonté des parties, par Malik Laazouzi (Respect for the will of the parties in the case law of the International Commercial Chamber)
  • La jurisprudence de la chambre commerciale internationale en matière d’arbitrage international : le respect des droits et principes fondamentaux, par Malik Laazouzi (Respect for fundamental rights and principles in the case law of the International Commercial Chamber)

Volume 4 also includes two other articles (Varia) and three « focus » :

– « Le contentieux interaméricain des droits de l’homme, remède efficace à la violation des droits des peuples autochtones ? Réflexions à partir de l’affaire Lhaka Honhat ». Patrick Jacob examines ‘Inter-American human rights litigation: an effective remedy for the violation of indigenous peoples’ rights? Reflections based on the Lhaka Honhat case’. This case gave rise to a ruling by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in 2020.

– « La notion de matière contractuelle dans le règlement Bruxelles I bis, sous l’angle des perspectives contentieuses ». Marjolaine Roccati provides a detailed analysis of the concept of contractual matters in the Brussels I bis Regulation from a litigation perspective.

– Les perspectives contentieuses de l’avis sur le climat : le juge national au premier plan (G. Giraudeau). On the opinion of the International Court of Justice : Litigation prospects for the climate opinion: national judges at the forefront (G. Giraudeau)

– Regarding the German OLG Hamm decision on climate litigation: « Affaire Lliuya / RWE, à contentieux, stratégique, décision stratégique » (F. Jault-Seseke).

– Regarding the recent French decree on amicable dispute resolution methods: « Refonte des dispositions du Code de procédure civile régissant les modes de résolution amiable des différends » (E. Myrto Kapetanaki).

Tags: journal
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Tobias Lutzi https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Tobias Lutzi2026-01-07 19:35:212026-01-07 19:35:48Perspectives Contentieuses Internationales (PCI), Volume 4

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: Enforceability of foreign judgments for punitive damages under English law and South African law Link to: Enforceability of foreign judgments for punitive damages under English law and South African law Enforceability of foreign judgments for punitive damages under English law and... Link to: Quick and easy access to German case law in private international law – One year of ‘IPRspr 2.0’ (and almost 100 years of ‘IPRspr’) Link to: Quick and easy access to German case law in private international law – One year of ‘IPRspr 2.0’ (and almost 100 years of ‘IPRspr’) Quick and easy access to German case law in private international law – One...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top