Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Seminar on the Service and Evidence Regulations recast – at Maastricht University on 19 June 2023 (in Dutch)

May 15, 2023/in News/by Mayela Celis
image_pdfimage_print

 

 

 

 

A seminar will be held on 19 June 2023 at Maastricht University in the Netherlands concerning the Service and Evidence Regulations recast (see here our previous post regarding these regulations).

This seminar is being organised within the framework of the DIGI-GUARD project, which is co-funded by the European Union under the JUST-2021-JCOO program and which stands for Digital communication and safeguarding the parties’ rights: challenges for European civil procedure.

Among the topics to be discussed will be the electronic service of documents, e-codex and many other practicalities relating to the service and the taking of evidence within the European Union. It will include breakout sessions where practical examples will be discussed and led by officials / practitioners.

Discussions will take place in Dutch.

For more information (incl. registration), please click here. Attendance is possible both online and in-person. Please find the program below.

Programma

13:00 – 13:25 uur Ontvangst en inschrijving
13:30 – 13:40 uur Welkom door Pauline van der Grinten
13:40 – 14:25 uur Wannes Vandenbussche
De Betekeningsverordening: een overzicht van de recente wijzigingen en een stand van zaken
14:30 – 15:15 uur Cedric Vanleenhove
De Bewijsverordening: een overzicht van recente wijzigingen en een stand van zaken
15:30 – 16:15 uur Praktische oefeningen (breakout rooms)

  1. Betekenen in het buitenland – o.l.v. Bartosz Sujecki en een gerechtsdeurwaarder
  2. Bewijsvoering in het buitenland – o.l.v. een rechter
16:20 – 16:40 uur Marta Pertegás Sender
Het DIGI-GUARD project: relevantie voor de rechtspraktijk
16:40 – 17:00 uur Discussie
17:00 – 18:00 uur Borrel

 

Many other activities (mainly in English) are being held as part of the DIGI-GUARD project, click here for more information.

“Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither  the European Union nor the European Commission can be held responsible for them.”

 

 

 

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Mayela Celis https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Mayela Celis2023-05-15 16:14:092023-05-16 19:05:29Seminar on the Service and Evidence Regulations recast – at Maastricht University on 19 June 2023 (in Dutch)

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: To Stamp or Not to Stamp: Critiquing the Indian Supreme Court’s Judgement in N.N Global Link to: To Stamp or Not to Stamp: Critiquing the Indian Supreme Court’s Judgement in N.N Global To Stamp or Not to Stamp: Critiquing the Indian Supreme Court’s Judgement... Link to: Friendly Reminder: “Globalization through the re-codification of property law?” Link to: Friendly Reminder: “Globalization through the re-codification of property law?” Friendly Reminder: “Globalization through the re-codification of property...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top