Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Save the Dates: EAPIL Webinar Series on the Proposal for an EU Regulation on Parenthood

April 7, 2023/in News/by Susanne Gössl
image_pdfimage_print

As already reported here, the European Kommission adopted a Proposal for a Regulation in December 2022 which aims to harmonize at the EU level the rules of private international law with regard to parenthood. In May the EAPIL is organizing a series of four webinars to discuss the main elements of the proposal, find weaknesses and possibilities of improvement.

Each Wednesday, the webinar will start at 6 pm and end at 8 pm CET. It will focus on two topics, each presented by one expert, who will discuss the content of the proposal and examine the questions and possible improvement it raises. There will be ample room for discussion.

The programme of the series is as follows:

  • 3 May 2023, chaired by Claire Fenton-Glynn:
    • The EU Proposal on Parenthood: lessons from comparative and substantive law (Jens Scherpe)
    • What’s in it? Subject matter, scope and definitions (Cristina González Beilfuss)
  • 10 May 2023, chaired by Fabienne Jault-Seseke:
    • The EU Proposal and primary EU law: a match made in heaven? (Susanne Gössl)
    • The law governing parenthood: are you my father? (Tobías Helms)
  • 17 May 2023, chaired by Nadia Rustinova:
    • The mutual recognition of decisions under the EU Proposal: much ado about nothing? (Alina Ontanu)
    • Who decides on parenthood? The rules of jurisdiction (Maria Caterina Baruffi)
  • 24 May 2023, chaired by Steven Heylen:
    • Authentic documents and parenthood: between recognition and acceptance (Patrick Wautelet)
    • The European certificate of Parenthood: a passport for parents and children? (Ilaria Pretelli)

For more information please visit the Website of the EAPIL.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Susanne Gössl https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Susanne Gössl2023-04-07 10:55:422023-04-07 10:55:42Save the Dates: EAPIL Webinar Series on the Proposal for an EU Regulation on Parenthood

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: 17th Anniversary & New General Editors Link to: 17th Anniversary & New General Editors 17th Anniversary & New General Editors Link to: Applying Mexican Law in U.S. Courts? Mexico v Smith & Wesson Link to: Applying Mexican Law in U.S. Courts? Mexico v Smith & Wesson Applying Mexican Law in U.S. Courts? Mexico v Smith & Wesson
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top