Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Douglas and Bath on important changes to the New South Wales’ Uniform Civil Procedure Rules

September 3, 2017/in /by Brooke Marshall
image_pdfimage_print

Mr Michael Douglas and Prof Vivienne Bath, of Sydney Law School, have published an article on recent amendments to the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules regarding service outside the Australian state of New South Wales. Under the Rules, effective service of the court’s originating process on a defendant outside New South Wales will establish the court’s personal jurisdiction over the defendant. The article clearly sets out and analyses changes to the bases on which a defendant can be served outside Australia under the Rules. Numerous bases have been significantly expanded. It also considers the effect of a new rule allowing for a defendant to be served outside Australia, with the court’s leave, where the claim does not fall within one of those bases. Among the particularly helpful aspects of the article are several comparative tables displaying the original rule, the revision and the authors’ projected impact of the revision.

The authors’ abstract is as follows:

‘In December 2016, the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) were amended in respect of service outside of the jurisdiction and outside Australia. Previously, service outside Australia was authorised if the claim had a specified connection to the forum. The claim was required to fall within one or more of the heads of Schedule 6. If the defendant failed to appear, the plaintiff would require leave to proceed. That position remains the default under the amended Rules, although the heads of Schedule 6 have been revised. However, there has also been a significant change. Under the new Rules, if the claim does not fall within Schedule 6, service may be authorised with the prior leave of the court. This article outlines and comments on the changes to the Rules, identifying areas which may require judicial clarification.’

The paper is available on SSRN at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3025146

Its suggested citation is: Michael Douglas and Vivienne Bath, ‘A New Approach to Service Outside the Jurisdiction and Outside Australia under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules’ (2017) 44(2) Australian Bar Review 160.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Brooke Marshall https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Brooke Marshall2017-09-03 14:58:262017-09-03 14:58:26Douglas and Bath on important changes to the New South Wales’ Uniform Civil Procedure Rules

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • CJEU in Marwanak C-873/24 on the interpretation of the Succession Regulation in light of its objectives November 11, 2026
  • Enforcing China’s Statutory Post-Judgment Interest in Other Jurisdictions November 11, 2026
  • Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments between Greece and Albania November 6, 2026
  • Brazil’s Superior Court Invokes Forum Non Conveniens: Is that Really What They Mean? November 4, 2026
  • Recognition of a Kosovar Judgment in Greece October 28, 2026
  • The Philippines: Recognition of Foreign Divorces and Recent Amendments to the Rules of Court October 21, 2026
  • Mozambican Supreme Court Recognises an Indian Adoption: A Teleological Approach to the Recognition of Foreign Acts October 19, 2026
  • Egyptian Supreme Court Enforces Italian Judgment: The Right Outcome despite Some Reservations October 14, 2026
  • Talaq Divorce Cases in the United States October 7, 2026
  • Book Review: Choice of Forum Clauses in Asia (Lemuel L Lopez) October 5, 2026
  • Zamzam on Egyptian Private International Law (in Arabic): Towards Reviving the Golden Age of Egyptian Private International Law October 2, 2026
  • Maintenance Duties for a Gestational Surrogate Following Non-Recognition – An Unreported Spanish Judgment September 22, 2026
  • From Symbolism to Substance: Comity and Judicial Reform in South Africa’s Foreign Judgments Regime September 15, 2026
  • Persistent and Reasonable Efforts in the Field of Cross-Border Service of Documents. Continuation or Stay of Proceedings? September 12, 2026
  • Speaking for the Dead: Idziski and the Forum for Post-Mortem Likeness Claims September 7, 2026
Link to: Litigación Internacional en la Unión Europea I: el Reglamento Bruselas I-bis Link to: Litigación Internacional en la Unión Europea I: el Reglamento Bruselas I-bis Litigación Internacional en la Unión Europea I: el Reglamento Bruselas I-... Link to: Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 5/2017: Abstracts Link to: Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 5/2017: Abstracts Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 5/2017: Abs...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top