Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

French Conference on Parallel Proceedings and Decisions in International Arbitration

February 27, 2014/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

The students and alumni in International Law of the University Panthéon-Assas will organize a conference on Parallel Proceedings and Contradictory Decisions in International Arbitration on March 21st, 2014 in the premises of the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris.

The morning will be dedicated to Investment Arbitration. The afternoon will focus on Commercial Arbitration and International Private Law. Speeches will be in French.

This event is organized by three students associations of the masters’ degree in International Private Law and International Business Law, International (Droit International Privé et Droit du Commerce International), in International Relations and Trade Law (Droit des Relations Economiques Internationales) and of the Institut des Hautes Etudes Internationales of the University Panthéon-Assas, in collaboration with two research centers, namely the Centre de Recherche de Droit International (CRDI) and l’Institut des Hautes Etudes Internationales (IHEI).

 

Matinée : Droit des Investissements (9h45-12h30)

– Développement des procédures parallèles et facteurs de désordres procéduraux en arbitrage d’investissement: Walid BEN HAMIDA (Université d’Evry Val-Essonne)

– La contrariété de décisions en arbitrage d’investissement, risques et conséquences: Fernando MANTILLA SERRANO (Shearman & Sterling LLP Paris)

– Retour sur la pertinence de la distinction « contract claims » et « treaty claims » : Ibrahim FADLALLAH (Université Paris-Ouest Nanterre la Défense)

– Procédures Parallèles : aspects procéduraux et solutions institutionnelles : Eloïse OBADIA (Derains & Gharavi Washington D.C.)

– La concurrence des instances arbitrales : que disent les principes du contentieux international ? Yves NOUVEL (Université Panthéon-Assas)

 

Après-midi : Arbitrage Commercial International

– Propos introductifs : M. Philippe LEBOULANGER (Leboulanger & Associés)

– La prévention des contrariétés de décisions arbitrale et étatique : Claire DEBOURG (Université Paris-Ouest Nanterre la Défense)

– De l’utilisation des « anti-suit injunctions » par le juge et l’arbitre : Jacob GRIERSON (McDermott Will & Emery Londres et Paris)

– L’exclusion de l’arbitrage dans le Règlement Bruxelles I refondu : Laurence USUNIER (Université Paris XIII Nord)

– Les contrariétés de décisions dans le contrôle des sentences arbitrales : Sylvain BOLLEE (Université Paris 1)

– Une illustration récente : l’affaire Planor Afrique : Alexandre REYNAUD (Betto Seraglini)

– Les procédures parallèles dans le règlement d’arbitrage et de médiation de la Chambre de Commerce Internationale : Thomas GRANIER (Cour internationale d’arbitrage de la CCI)

– Un remède, la concentration du contentieux devant l’arbitre (extension et transmission de la convention d’arbitrage) : Jean-Pierre ANCEL (Président de chambre honoraire à la Cour de cassation)

– Propos conclusifs : Daniel COHEN (Université Panthéon-Assas)

 

Venue : ICC, 33/43, Avenue du Président Wilson, 75116 Paris

 

Admission is free. Registration is possible by sending an email at : elise.grandgeorge@u-paris2.fr , message in which you should indicate your presence for the morning, the afternoon or the day and your name and phone number.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2014-02-27 07:33:082014-02-27 07:33:08French Conference on Parallel Proceedings and Decisions in International Arbitration

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Support in cross-border decision-making by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
Link to: Weidemaier on Sovereign Immunity and Sovereign Debt Link to: Weidemaier on Sovereign Immunity and Sovereign Debt Weidemaier on Sovereign Immunity and Sovereign Debt Link to: The UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Investor-State Treaty-based Arbitration Link to: The UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Investor-State Treaty-based Arbitration The UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Investor-State Treaty-based Arbitrati...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top