Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Yes We Can, Except in Belgium

April 22, 2012/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

Can France control the internet?

Today, the French are voting to elect their next president. They may vote until 8 pm. But polls have been available since mid afternoon, and it has long been considered in France that nobody should vote knowing those polls, and pretty much the results. French law thus prohibits to publish any poll before 8 pm…

Everyone knows, however, that French law will have a hard time reaching other countries, and websites of newspapers in other countries.  Whatever! French officials have declared that a team of 20 people has been surfing on the internet to locate any tortfeasor and denounce him to French prosecution services. Everybody knows where the bad guys might be: Switzerland, Belgium … Can France control Swiss and Belgian newspapers?

An additional measure has been to get nine French polling agencies to undertake to starve potential tortfeasors, by waiting until 8 to reveal the precious information…

So, have the French scared their neighbours?

Le Temps (Geneva)

Pourquoi Le Temps ne publiera pas d’estimations anticipée

Une discussion est née, en cette fin de semaine, doublée d’une radicalisation des positions, en ce qui concerne la publication anticipée des estimations de votes de l’élection présidentielle française

Il faut savoir que les principaux instituts de sondage français mettent à disposition de leurs mandataires des estimations basées sur le dépouillement des premiers bureaux tests. Lors des précédentes élections, ces estimations étaient largement portées, au-delà des mandataires directs, à la connaissance des médias étrangers à l’Hexagone. Elles étaient sourcées et livrées de bonne grâce.

Aujourd’hui, cette situation a considérablement changé: les neuf principaux instituts de sondage français qui recueillent et élaborent pareilles estimations ont promis de ne pas communiquer ces résultats aux médias étrangers qui ne respecteraient pas l’embargo de 20h00. Dès lors ces sondages ne sont plus accessibles que de seconde main et ne peuvent être publiés qu’au mépris des engagements pris par les instituts.

Au vu de cette situation nouvelle, née de l’exacerbation de la polémique liée à une publication anticipée, Le Temps, après réflexion et pesée précise des intérêts, a décidé de ne publier ces estimations que dès 20h01, dans le respect des embargos décidés.

Summary: now that we cannot get the polls directly from the polling agencies, let’s obey the French embargo.

Le Soir (Brussels)

Toute publication est interdite en France avant 20h00, sous peine d’amendes. Mais le soir.be vous dévoile en exclu les premiers resultats.

Summary: In France, revealing any information would be a criminal offence, but we could not care less, and here they are!

Forthcoming on conflictoflaws.net: France v. Le Soir !

UPDATE: French prosecution services have announced that they are investigating several Belgian media and journalists.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2012-04-22 17:57:332012-04-23 05:57:07Yes We Can, Except in Belgium

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
Link to: Two New U.S. Decisions on Argentina Sovereign Debt Cases Link to: Two New U.S. Decisions on Argentina Sovereign Debt Cases Two New U.S. Decisions on Argentina Sovereign Debt Cases Link to: New Canadian Framework for Assumption of Jurisdiction Link to: New Canadian Framework for Assumption of Jurisdiction New Canadian Framework for Assumption of Jurisdiction
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top