Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Weber on Creditor Protection in International Civil Procedure

October 14, 2011/in /by Giesela Ruehl
image_pdfimage_print

Johannes Weber, a research fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Law in Hamburg, has written a book on “Gesellschaftsrecht und Gläubigerschutz im Internationalen Zivilverfahrensrecht. Die Internationale Zuständigkeit bei Klagen gegen Gesellschafter und Gesellschaftsorgane vor und in der Insolvenz” [Corporate Law and Creditor Protection in International Civil Procedure. The International Jurisdiction for Actions against Shareholders and Directors before and during Insolvency]. Here is an English abstract:

Creditor protection in respect of limited liability corporations is a topic assuming an increasingly central role in corporate law and private international law. Whereas the scholarly discussion has primarily focused on substantive law issues and the appropriate connecting factors from a private international law perspective, the question of international civil procedure has thus far received relatively little attention. In his work “Gesellschaftsrecht und Gläubigerschutz im Internationalen Zivilverfahrensrecht” (Corporate Law and Creditor Protection in International Civil Procedure), Dr. Johannes Weber, research fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, addresses the question of which court may claim international jurisdiction when it comes to the enforcement of creditor protection in respect of corporations. Analyzing the question in the context of EU international civil procedure, Weber’s analysis offers in particular a comparison of German and English substantive law. Revealing a number of significant substantive contrasts between the two distinct legal traditions, the inquiry is also of considerable relevance in light of the number of business entities incorporated under British law. Each chapter of the work concludes with a discussion on the perspectives for future legal reform.

More information is available on the publisher’s website.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giesela Ruehl https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giesela Ruehl2011-10-14 15:40:502011-10-14 15:40:50Weber on Creditor Protection in International Civil Procedure

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: French Conference on Arbitration and EU Law Link to: French Conference on Arbitration and EU Law French Conference on Arbitration and EU Law Link to: Clearer Patrimonial Regimes for International Couples: Joint Conference of the European Commission and CNUE Link to: Clearer Patrimonial Regimes for International Couples: Joint Conference of the European Commission and CNUE Clearer Patrimonial Regimes for International Couples: Joint Conference of the...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top