Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Fourth Issue of 2008’s Revue Critique de Droit International Privé

February 24, 2009/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

Revue Critique DIPThe fourth issue of the Revue Critique de Droit International Privé was just released.

It contains two articles. Unfortunately, none of them comes with an abstract in English.

The first is a presentation of the Rome I Regulation by emeritus Professor Paul Lagarde and Aline Tenenbaum, who lectures at the Faculty of Law of Paris XII University.

Belgian Professor Marc Fallon is the author of the second, which deals with The Posting of Workers in Europe (Le détachement européen des travailleurs, à la croisée de deux logiques conflictualistes).

The table of contents can be found here , but articles of the Revue Critique cannot be downloaded.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2009-02-24 08:33:002009-02-24 08:41:13Fourth Issue of 2008’s Revue Critique de Droit International Privé

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Link to: Supreme Court of Canada Addresses Role of Parallel Proceedings in Stay Applications Link to: Supreme Court of Canada Addresses Role of Parallel Proceedings in Stay Applications Supreme Court of Canada Addresses Role of Parallel Proceedings in Stay Appl... Link to: An Early 2009 Round-Up: Significant Federal Cases Over the Past Two Months Link to: An Early 2009 Round-Up: Significant Federal Cases Over the Past Two Months An Early 2009 Round-Up: Significant Federal Cases Over the Past Two Months
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top