Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Seminar: A Coherent Legal Regime for EU Media – Balancing Liberties

October 7, 2006/in /by Martin George
image_pdfimage_print

Diana Wallis MEP, on behalf of the ALDE group, is holding a seminar on 17 October 2006 in the European Parliament. The seminar is entitled: 'A coherent legal regime for EU media – Balancing liberties. The right to be let alone v. freedom of speech'. As Ms Wallis' website states,

This event will gather experts, academics and Members of the European Parliament to discuss the current legal regime for EU media and explore possible options for the future, in particular with regard to the issue of applicable law. This seminar is set against the background of the Commission's rejection of Parliament's first reading formulation on defamation and the withdrawal of these provisions from the draft Regulation. The second reading of Rome II scheduled for the end of 2006 also coincides with the discussions on Television without Frontiers and the review of Brussels I and the E-commerce Directive.

DRAFT PROGRAMME

12.45 – 13.00: Introductory Welcome

Session 1. Chair: Diana Wallis MEP, Rapporteur on Rome II

13.00 -13.30: European Private International Law and the media: relationship between existing instruments

  • Speakers: Gregory Paulger, DG 'Information, Society and Media', European Commission
  • Claudia Hahn, DG 'Justice and Home Affairs', European Commission

Alde Seminar 13.30 – 14.00: Jurisdiction, applicable law and the country of origin principle

  • Speakers: Horatia Muir Watts, Université Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne
  • Professor Paul Beaumont, University of Aberdeen

14.00 – 14.30: Q&A

14.30 – 14.50: Tea and coffee break

Session 2. Chair: Jean-Marie Cavada MEP, Chairman of LIBE

14.50 – 15.20: Applicable law to the violation of personality rights – a quest for reasonableness?

  • Speakers: Marie-Christine de Perçin, vice chairperson of Presse-Liberté
  • Speaker invited

15.20 – 15.50: Regulating the media: what role for the EU?

  • Speakers: Tim Sutter, OFCOM
  • Cecilia Renfors, Swedish audiovisual board

15.50 – 16.20: Q&A

16.20 – 16.30: Conclusions

The event will take place on Tuesday 17 October 2006 from 12.45 to 16.30 at European Parliament, Brussels, room ASP 3G3. More information on attending the event can be found here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Martin George https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Martin George2006-10-07 17:40:562006-11-25 15:08:42Seminar: A Coherent Legal Regime for EU Media – Balancing Liberties

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: German Federal Supreme Court: Jurisdiction over Applications for an Injunction due to Nuisance Link to: German Federal Supreme Court: Jurisdiction over Applications for an Injunction due to Nuisance German Federal Supreme Court: Jurisdiction over Applications for an Injunction... Link to: Recognition of a Surname and Validity 2 Link to: Recognition of a Surname and Validity 2 Recognition of a Surname and Validity 2
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top