Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

EU Member State sees opportunities in Brexit: Belgium is establishing a new English-language commercial court

November 8, 2017/4 Comments/in Views/by Sophia Tang
image_pdfimage_print

Expecting higher demands for international commercial dispute resolution following Britain’s departure from the EU, Belgium plans to set up a new English-language commercial court, the Brussels International Business Court (BIBC), to take cases away from the courts and tribunals in London. This decision was announced on 27 Oct 2017. This BIBC is designed to address disputes arising out of Brexit and major international commercial disputes. The court will take jurisdiction based on parties’ choice, and will do the hearing and deliver judgments in English. The parties would have no right to appeal. BIBC combines elements of both traditional courts and arbitration. See comments here.

Although Brexit may cause uncertainty to litigants in the UK, a survey suggests that the EU judicial cooperation scheme is not the main reason for international parties choosing London to resolve their disputes. The top two factors that attract international litigants to London are the reputation and experience of English judges and combination of choice of court clauses with choice of law clauses in favor of English law,  followed by efficient remedies, procedural effectiveness, neutrality of the forum, market practice, English language, effective UK-based counsel, speed and enforceability of judgments. Furthermore, Brexit will not affect the New York Convention and would less likely affect London as an arbitration centre. It may be more reasonable to suggest that the main purpose of BIBC is not to compete with London at the international level, but to offer additional judicial tool and become a new commercial dispute resolution centre within the EU to attract companies and businesses to Brussels.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Sophia Tang https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Sophia Tang2017-11-08 11:39:222018-08-11 13:11:22EU Member State sees opportunities in Brexit: Belgium is establishing a new English-language commercial court
4 replies
  1. Jan von Hein says:
    November 10, 2017 at 10:09 am

    Thank you, Sophia, this is very interesting! In fact, other EU Member States are taking similar steps. The German State Hessen has already announced to establish an English-language chamber for commercial cases at the Higher Regional Court in Frankfurt from 2018, see here: https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/lg-frankfurt-gerichtsstandort-kammer-englischsprachig-handelssachen/

  2. Matthias Lehmann says:
    November 10, 2017 at 3:15 pm

    To add to Sophia and Jan, other Member States have similar plans. See for France: http://www.justice.gouv.fr/publication/Rapport_chambres_internationales.pdf
    and for the Netherlands: https://netherlands-commercial-court.com/
    It seems like there is a competition going on for being the next European litigation hub.

  3. Thomas U Poschitz says:
    November 14, 2017 at 2:48 am

    Thank you, Sophia. Would you mind specifying the survey you are referring to? Unfortunately, the hyperlink seems to be directed only at the general “Research at MOJ” page.
    Many thanks in advance!

  4. Sophia Tang says:
    November 14, 2017 at 1:41 pm

    Hi, Thomas. I have corrected the link. It should work now. Or you can try this one: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/396343/factors-influencing-international-litigants-with-commercial-claims.pdf.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: CJEU on the place of the damage under Article 7(2) of Brussels Ia as regards violation of personality rights of a legal person Link to: CJEU on the place of the damage under Article 7(2) of Brussels Ia as regards violation of personality rights of a legal person CJEU on the place of the damage under Article 7(2) of Brussels Ia as regards... Link to: EU Study on “Cross-border restitution claims of looted works of art and cultural goods” Link to: EU Study on “Cross-border restitution claims of looted works of art and cultural goods” EU Study on “Cross-border restitution claims of looted works of art and cultural...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top