Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Bar Associations Lend Support to Hague Choice of Court Convention

December 7, 2013/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

The Hague Conference on Private International Law has announced that the German Bar Association (Deutschen Anwaltverein, or DAV) has encouraged the European Union to ratify the Choice of Court Convention. In a statement released in October 2013 (official version in German; a courtesy translation performed by the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference can be found here), the DAV, which represents the interests of the German bar at the national, European and international level, emphasised the significance of the Convention for EU litigants, and recommended that the EU extend the recognition and enforcement regime of the Convention to non-exclusive choice of court agreements (pursuant to Art. 22).

The statement follows support for the Convention from other national and international bar associations. In June, the Inter-American Bar Association recommended that States join the Convention. In 2006, the American Bar Association passed a resolution urging the United States to join the Convention, which was followed in 2009 by the US signing the Convention.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2013-12-07 10:15:022013-12-07 10:15:02Bar Associations Lend Support to Hague Choice of Court Convention

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • CJEU in Marwanak C 873/24 on the interpretation of the Succession Regulation in light of its objectives November 11, 2026
  • Enforcing China’s Statutory Post-Judgment Interest in Other Jurisdictions November 11, 2026
  • Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments between Greece and Albania November 6, 2026
  • Brazil’s Superior Court Invokes Forum Non Conveniens: Is that Really What They Mean? November 4, 2026
  • Recognition of a Kosovar Judgment in Greece October 28, 2026
  • The Philippines: Recognition of Foreign Divorces and Recent Amendments to the Rules of Court October 21, 2026
  • Mozambican Supreme Court Recognises an Indian Adoption: A Teleological Approach to the Recognition of Foreign Acts October 19, 2026
  • Egyptian Supreme Court Enforces Italian Judgment: The Right Outcome despite Some Reservations October 14, 2026
  • Talaq Divorce Cases in the United States October 7, 2026
  • Book Review: Choice of Forum Clauses in Asia (Lemuel L Lopez) October 5, 2026
  • Zamzam on Egyptian Private International Law (in Arabic): Towards Reviving the Golden Age of Egyptian Private International Law October 2, 2026
  • Maintenance Duties for a Gestational Surrogate Following Non-Recognition – An Unreported Spanish Judgment September 22, 2026
  • From Symbolism to Substance: Comity and Judicial Reform in South Africa’s Foreign Judgments Regime September 15, 2026
  • Persistent and Reasonable Efforts in the Field of Cross-Border Service of Documents. Continuation or Stay of Proceedings? September 12, 2026
  • Speaking for the Dead: Idziski and the Forum for Post-Mortem Likeness Claims September 7, 2026
Link to: Milan Conference on the Reform of the Brussels I Regime (13 December 2013) Link to: Milan Conference on the Reform of the Brussels I Regime (13 December 2013) Milan Conference on the Reform of the Brussels I Regime (13 December 2013) Link to: ERA / MPI Conference on Arbitration and EU Law Link to: ERA / MPI Conference on Arbitration and EU Law ERA / MPI Conference on Arbitration and EU Law
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top